To describe a relationship between the sexes from a female perspective, there is no use of personal pronouns in the film, no psychological description, how to achieve this goal.
Controlling the weight of the shots, there are many shots showing the woman's micro-expressions, her reaction to things, otherwise the audience doesn't understand men. In this way, the audience can be brought into the female characters and seen through the eyes of women.
Rich arrangements are made for the woman's life background, her occupation, her friends, family, her reproductive process, her recovery life, and the man's background, which are relatively sketchy. The appearance of the lover is related to women every time, causing the escalation of the war.
A man takes a woman to a drugstore, which is a foreshadowing, he leads her into a Shura field, and every lover of him is crazy for him. Men's drug use and derailment are all given an intuitive picture. In contrast, the severity of women's drug use and hysteria during pregnancy is revealed through words. This is in line with the psychology that people tend to magnify the faults of others while downplaying their own mistakes.
The degree of interpretation of the concepts of both sides is also different. For a man, he is very clear about love, but the director only gave him a few words to make it clear. A woman's love cannot be cut off by herself, but there are many worldly forces helping her, she can make public accusations, her family gives her admonitions and comforts, and she can gain the sympathy of most people.
The title itself also hints at the woman's usual passive role. Creators create characters, and they can't predict what these characters will become, what kind of inclinations will appear, and events will occur naturally. I hope that neither the ending nor the value orientation is clear, that's what makes it interesting.
View more about My King reviews
