How to evaluate a movie depends to a large extent on the state of mind at the time of evaluation. It can be blasted, or it can be blasted. Not necessarily based on the objective performance of the work itself. That's why works of art are rated "emotional" in my mind.
Rick and Morty can be said to be full of unrestrained and talented imagination.
But it is a fast-paced and illogical narrative like a running account, and there is nothing left after reading it.
Originally, the strongest old Rui in the universe has a super problem-solving ability that makes this work a bit high-tech and gorgeous.
But some extremely absurd logic makes people feel that this is just a cartoon.
Originally, the overflowing dark attributes of this family created a diaosi atmosphere of ridicule for the sake of ridicule.
But the loneliness of the last rick makes people think that there are adult worries here that make people think...
In a word, it is really difficult to define.
The so-called high-level creation should be both content and form of expression, but the content of this work is deeply hidden. It seems that only "excessive interpretation" can make this plot meaningful. In terms of form, because the rhythm is too fast, after reading it, there is almost nothing left.
I really want to know what kind of purpose the editor wants to achieve when he creates. Is it based on popular algorithms that find many elements that cater to the tastes of most audiences? Or do you really want to convey a kind of concept?
View more about Edge of Tomorty: Rick Die Rickpeat reviews
