Relive the past
"Time Shock" wrote,
The premise of "Shiquan One" is that the sudden space-time anomaly makes everyone and everything return to ten years ago, no matter whether it is good or bad, and repeat the past.
Encountering again can be said to have a bit of this meaning - "replaying the past". Dialogue people can repeat what has happened through dialogue, memory, and repetition. In "Nuan Nuan Containing Light", even if the memory can be deleted, people still can't stop falling in love with a certain person. This kind of determination has a sense of fatalistic romance.
"Conversations with Women" also has this kind of "replaying the past", and the way it brings out the past becomes gentle, and it even makes people wonder if this will be the beginning of a new story.
At the wedding banquet, the two met, had a conversation, and everything seemed familiar. We discover as the story progresses that all of this happened. People who originally thought they didn't know each other turned out to be a couple that had been separated for a long time, and even had no contact for many years.
They recreated the conversation they had talked to many years ago. One party tried to tell the other party that they had never forgotten all these details, and the other party also accepted all the memories, and their own memories were clear and verifiable. Similar to a kind of aggressive method, if you want to connect your emotions again, you can presume that if there is no connection, you will not participate in the beginning.
Can this period of warm-up bring the relationship back to the period of passionate love?
chatter
There are many movies in the form of dialogue, and gradually fight the inner emotions of the characters and the truth of the events. The process is about the wrestling and exposure between the two to achieve connection.
An interesting point is that these stories are often told in two extremes: some are about strangers who have never met, who are attracted to each other, have their own pasts hanging around waiting to be revealed, or will be created together through dialogue. New history; some of them happen to people who have known each other for many years. They can live together for a long time, but each has questions that have been put aside and have not explored, and have unspoken words. It can also be an ex-husband and wife who have been separated or have not seen each other for many years, and some shadows linger.
"Dialogue" belongs to the latter, so when the two face the reality - when we meet again and can talk, the wrestling begins. Ask about topics that have never been asked before, those cracks that cannot be opened when they are still together.
For example, from shallow to deep, first correct the fallacy of the memory of the other party in the conversation just now, "It was not the case at the time", and then show a kind of frankness, let us talk about the fact of betrayal, "then you two were together".
Is it really frank to break off the grudges in the previous emotions?
aphasia
"Dialogue" can go to this stage and relive each other's feelings, but the reality will cut into this private space created by only two people from time to time, and more and more oppress the air in this space. The time to leave is coming, and everyone has another life that is hard to let go.
Maybe we'll resist the chatter. The seemingly meaningless words also occupy time at the beginning, and by the time they are discovered, the time will be long enough. There is no connection between those words, and the words do not convey their meaning. Even if the logical direction behind it is to want the other party to feel their urgent true feelings, the listener does not need it. What they wanted to hear was never heard. The person who spoke, still lacked some courage. Of course, the speaker may have no confidence. After all, the person you hear can't make the choice you want.
People still can't help but say something, trying to stop someone who is about to leave in this way. Those who know that they may not be saved are like time that cannot be reversed. To fall into silence is to declare that we accept the passage of time and our powerlessness. Then speaking, it is all that a person can do in the end, and it may be able to turn the tide, like a relative effort.
It's just another time shock
It was not until the moment when the timequake happened that people were no longer puppets manipulated by their past lives. As the aging science fiction writer Kilgore Trout put it: "One can't stop from the obstacle course they set up until free will strikes again."
Is dwelling on the past an obstacle course that people set for themselves? Is the real world really free will? For Dialogue, it was just another time shock.
In time-traveling, you will never be able to say something you didn't say ten years ago. If you didn't survive or save your loved one's life the first time, there's nothing you can do about it this time.
If you want to repeat the old feelings, there are still those cracks in the relationship, and there is nothing you can do about it. The point of a new story is that it is never a repetition. Just like the last voice of the male protagonist, he has old emotions that he doesn't want to end, and he just wants a little happiness in reality.
View more about Conversations with Other Women reviews
