Compared with the book, the movie is a bit shallow.
First of all, the erotic scenes that appear in it are definitely well done.
Then talk about feelings. If I don't know the facts of the fragment in reality, and I haven't read the book, I would think that Annie should not have two things, or it's a bit awkward. One, her husband also looks very sexually attractive and treats her very well. He should also be good in bed, and on the day of the carnival, HUGO appeared as a man covered in paint, and easily carried Annie to the corner. Forcible sex there, and Annie didn't know it was her husband until about the same time. This scene made me think: God, this man is wild too. So her husband and she should be quite right. So I don't understand why Annie still has no guilt at all for cheating on the Red Wall. Although, of course, her way of thinking and conclusions are inherently different from the average person. Second, in the part with Henry and Joan, which can be regarded as a love triangle for the time being, I think what is shown in the movie is a little girl who wants to intervene between her parents. Henry and Joan have an irresistible attraction to Annie. She was obsessed with Joan's charm and tried her best to imitate her. This is how I feel when I watch the movie. She desperately wanted to experience the wildness both of them had. Even if you are tempted, you want to be someone who can be tempted.
The issue of passion and lust is something I've been trying to figure out lately. very curious.
But the roles of Annie and Joan are both well-chosen. Annie's eyes matched her petite body, a cat-like woman.
View more about Henry & June reviews