So, let’s learn from the experience, like me, look at this film with the eyes of “Love in Prague”, figure out this problem as soon as possible, and you won’t spend a lot of time in confusion. Kaufman's positioning in this film is completely different. Have you ever seen a french erotic movie? Ordinary, this is one of these movies, except for a few Brassey-style camera lenses dangling in it, it is really just a luxury decoration. For the deepening of the theme, its role is like a drop in the bucket. Knowing this, you know what to look for and what not to look for in this film.
The four bases of erotic films:
1. The camera is idle. The theme of erotic films is eroticism, and without a heavy core theme, the shots don’t have to engage in tense battles around something, and they don’t have to exact the logical necessity of each shot.
2. Position differentiation. Ning said to Joan: I love you! Joan didn't believe it. Nor do we believe it. At this time, the positions of the audience and the director were clearly differentiated. The director let us easily see that his position was with Ning, but he deliberately did not work hard to convince us, just click on it. Love is not the problem, he doesn't care.
3. Form floating. High-end erotic films are mostly controlled by male directors. In the world of eroticism, men are accustomed to taking time away from women. No matter which erotic director, they have the ability to bring a heroine with an empty look to the film. Life is very boring. Sex is light and salt. Their eyes are only for This shines. Themes are no longer burdensome, and the structure of the story seems reluctant: emotionally intense and boring, relationships complex and shallow. Within a minute of the opening minute, Maria de Medello came to a close-up of a big, empty eye. If you haven't adjusted your state and your mind is too pure, you will be stinged by that eye. Changed "Love in Prague", Kaufman had already regarded it as a rotten fly and quickly passed
4. The dubbing is sloppy. Even if the first three points are erased, I think we can quickly identify pornographic movies within the first few seconds. I guess subjectively, these kinds of films have some kind of privilege, and there is a kind of deliberate sloppy treatment of dubbing. Sometimes it is possible to record directly live, without having the actors re-record for more performative dialogue at all. Even if there is post-production synthesis, it should be casual, not performative.
The number of sex scenes and the length of time should not be a basis for judgment. For example, "The Frost Flower Shop" should not be classified as an erotic film. The eroticism of the Frost Flower Shop is just a slave, and the spirit means to control the overall situation.
In contrast, "Henry and Ning" has much less sex scenes. The best thing is that even if all the erotic scenes are deleted, it is still erotic. Even if the two writers are discussing literature, there is a kind of innocent and provocative air in the air, um, this is very cute. But you know, flirting is not the same as falling in love after all, flirting is safe, floating, and the joy comes and goes, leaving no scars.
View more about Henry & June reviews
