Young Philosophical point of view
First , there is a subjective and objective discussion of the existence of the French lieutenant.
Second, she clearly knows that passing in front of those talkative women will pass to her old maid employer and be insulted, but she still smiles from those talkative women. Passing through this is a kind of spiritual freedom and forced transformation into a masochistic thought.
Third , under the table lamp at night, is she a subjective reaction to the self-portrait in the mirror, or is it a Freudian objective subconscious? The devilishness is still a subconscious expression of the struggle for life. The film
itself would have been completely good without this woman, but as its title, The French Lieutenant's Woman, in fact, the later part of the story includes Charles, who is all of them. All for this mysterious woman as a foreshadowing, the structural narrative of the film itself is regarded as a key observation and research.
In fact, if a person has not read the original book and has not read the philosophy book, it is impossible to understand the woman Sarah called the French Lieutenant. She represents neither a character nor a kind of thought, nor does she respond to a problem. What she represents It's an era in the Victorian era where pornography and sex are rampant, but all that is left is the surviving manuscripts and extremely cryptic language, just like herself. Sarah tells the story of a French lieutenant who seduced her and placed her in loneliness and shame. And her telling is what constitutes a temptation and a guide for Charles to lure Charles into it and then she slips away She gets the so-called narrow freedom she wants by telling what she wants regardless of the end of the film. Once again guiding Charles to find himself a lot of people say this ending is a perfect ending and the lover is married in fact I don't think so I think it's just that Sarah's mind has taken a new turn after three years like she said it herself That way she finally figured it out but the question is whether the figure out of her mouth as a woman of mystery represents another new coercion we don't know
The other thread is a sweet thread maybe Karel Reisz (forgive me I don't even know about this cow B director.) Considering the overall atmosphere of the film, if you only discuss the woman of the French lieutenant, it is estimated that 99 and a half of 100 people in this film can fall asleep watching this film. Many people think that this line is a tragedy at the end. But in my opinion, this line ended up being a real consummation, not to mention that the two of them could be filmed for three years in a scene, but because the philosophical issues in Sarah before their respective families had already been discussed, making it too late to think So what they have done here is against the moral standard in the eyes of normal people. If we discuss this ethical issue like a bridge bridge, it is estimated that this movie is really unwatchable, so this line is in my opinion. It's a relaxed and elegant branch line, or it's a comparison with Sarah before, or it's just to let us feel the beauty of this kind of social peace.
About the French lieutenant's woman, Karel Reisz has been trying to put herself in the position of a bystander. A real bystander is just doing what he sees with his eyes. He doesn't reflect any of Sarah's inner actions but just puts her in a few shots. From a normal woman to a mystery and every switch trying to express through the language of the montage composition that all you see is not a representation of reality but pure fiction You can't believe there is such a French lieutenant A woman is like you can't believe that the French lieutenant exists or not. This movie can make you feel that two love stories are told in parallel times. One 1 to 9 desperately strives for the ultimate success, and a 9 to 1 looks around Wishing for bed and bed to be silent and saying goodbye is just as ingenious. In fact, what it is saying, including Karel Reisz and novelist John Fowles, may not fully understand that great films and words are often not controlled by the director and the writer, but by the director. And the author
I haven't read the original book of this movie but I think if I were the author then the extreme analysis of the French lieutenant's woman's mental world in the original book would prove the point with some more thorough outward expressions and crazier moves What as for proving what I didn't live in the Victorian period The most important thing is that I really couldn't write such a profound book
View more about The French Lieutenant's Woman reviews
