I watched the movie off and on for several days. This seems to be a movie where everyone is telling their own story, there are many characters, but no one is in the same camp as anyone. Father, it is undeniable that he belongs to his own camp, and is the most vividly rewritten person in the real society. He grew up from passion, has long-term expectations for the country, and may also have enthusiasm for love. But in middle age, he has lost these original intentions, and his appearance is a typical polished father. He knows the rules of this society, and he lives within those rules. On the contrary, his family, his wife, are his opposites. They have their own views on this society, one is insisting, the other is still exploring. The daughter said a lot in one sentence. The father said that these are the times of experience, and the meaning of acceptance is implied, while the daughter said that not all experiences need to be experienced. That said, I have my own choices. It can be seen that the daughter does not want to go abroad. Here, I think the interpretation of the daughter is still in place. I can feel that she inherits her mother's ideals and struggles under her father's expectations. It's like a lot of us who are struggling. But I think she doesn't really belong to her mother's camp. You see, she has never completely resisted going abroad. If she hadn't been attacked, then there's a good chance she'd already been on the designed path.
It seems to be a competition between fathers and daughters, and it is probably also a competition between fathers and this society. Faced with the current situation, should we adapt to him or resist?
View more about
Graduation reviews