First of all, I have to admit that the production of this film is relatively good, from the picture quality to the dubbing, it is relatively mature. What I have to say is that the style of painting is so similar to Ghibli's work that it can be confused with the real one. Some people say that "Mary and the Witch's Flower" is a companion to "The Witch's Delivery Service". From the perspective of the style of painting, it is a bit similar, but from the perspective of content and connotation, it is really not.
I didn't really feel much after watching "Mary and the Witch's Flower", and even said, I don't know what this movie is trying to tell. The narrative pace is slow, the content is complex, and there is no core, which puzzles me. The "Witch's Delivery Service" is different. It always integrates the growth of the protagonist into the work, and many plots can resonate with the audience and have more connotation. So, allow me to deny the companion piece.
The protagonist of Mary and the Witch's Flower, Mary, is the most hated character in an anime movie I've seen in so many years. Stupid, reckless, clumsy, all the nasty elements in one, make me wonder, this is really Is it the protagonist? Finally, what I want to say is, future directors, can you stop imitating Ghibli's style of painting, can you stop using Ghibli as a gimmick, do you really have no dignity as directors? ?
View more about Mary and the Witch's Flower reviews