When I watched it, I thought, if a non-tramp throws shoes into the river pretending to be throwing guns, and after yelling, drags the woman and jumps into the river together, such a person is definitely extreme and unreliable, but he can also care about a person. Man's rash and extreme manifestations. But can non-hobos do it? His "have everything" will be firmly tied to his rationality, including the degree of giving and caring. Is it only because of being a vagabond who has nothing, can he be obedient and crazy without any scruples? It seems that he is a person who really "can afford it", because he has nothing to lose, and he will not appear humble because he has done these things, because it is already the lowest. Therefore, the old administrator's "love is in the bedroom, not on the street with the north wind blowing" is obviously a helpless joke that he does not admit, otherwise he would not follow his wife on the street, It was so painful to see Michelle again. To paraphrase the song I listened to yesterday, I think I am the sea, two homeless people, both of them are "the chest is knocked open, a small stone can make me surging".
View more about The Lovers on the Bridge reviews
