After watching the first 20 minutes of "Girl", I watched it frame by frame, and then fast-forwarded. Let me first say that there are a few places where I feel awkward. If I were the director, I would definitely not arrange it this way. I was surprised, apprehensive, and even a little uneasy about the footage of girls interacting with boys, or giving their mouths to boys. Why do you have to arrange it this way, and what is the purpose of your filming? I don't see any implication of having to make this shot: a very vague expression that can often replace everything, and doesn't have to be presented. As for the scene of the girl leaking her body, it can be kept, because it is one of the main clues of the film at the end. Although I also feel disgusting, but maybe it's my personal problem, fans can accept it. In addition, the overall feeling of the film is procrastinated, there is no very eye-catching performance, and the topics of sexual orientation and male and female will never be finished.
Well, let me talk about some of the inner logic that this film is going to express. For women, I personally prefer more masculine female men, and I don't like girls who are small birds. And the future will also be a world in which gender is increasingly blurred. Gender blurring is the basic foundation of modern human society. But some industries are naturally divided into men and women, and I don't think that the girl's male protagonist will lose to any woman who is explained by the camera in terms of beauty. And I want to praise the selection of the director, it's really awesome. This male young man was born a beautiful woman. Especially the neck, the outline has a hint of charm. I didn't even notice when I looked at the cover that she was a man. And I want to mention Rohmer's movie, go see it: each of the heroines in Rohmer's movies doesn't have the kind of women with big breasts and hips, and the men don't have that kind of particularly masculine men. Except for the men in "The Full Moon Reflecting the Flower City" and "The Lotus on the Beach", (because the plot requires) there are tattoos and ruffians. The rest are smooth, gentle men, while women are just that masculine and decisive. In fact, for some things, if you want to express the main idea, you can already express it very well through the chemical reaction of casting and lines. There is no need to overstate it. The director is obviously not ready for home. I still feel that some explicit scenes should not be there, ruining a pure film. Let me compare a few female characters in Rohmer with this male character. Can you see any similarities between them? I find it very interesting.
The next thing to discuss is the issue of breasts. I think Rohmer is deliberately avoiding female organs, and the heroines he chooses are not the kind of plump women. To be honest, it's to my own taste. And the male protagonist chosen by Rohmer has a hint of gloom and softness.
Alright, let’s talk so much, just write and play, and make some records.
View more about Girl reviews
