In the morning, I sorted out the bedroom, cleaned and washed the sheets, bookcases, and watched some TV dramas while sorting. After finishing, I found an English chapter and told myself that next week's exam should be a listening practice. It looked so logically.
The introduction is probably saying that the lover has become a son, and it is not a plot that attracts me. Just look at it.
Children's bridges will always make people follow along. After all, children are innocent and cute. Encounter, acquaintance, not too long transition. My favorite part of the snail, time flies, it seems that the snail has only climbed a few steps, 12 years apart. There are actually not many dialogues, concise pictures, and clear process. Personally, I think the rhythm of the plot is okay.
It seems very warm to meet again when we grow up, but I always feel that this kind of emotional connection is very weak. However, the plot of the movie is so affectionate that it wants to replicate the existence of this person.
Originally, I thought going out after the reunion was boring enough. I didn’t know where the plot was going. When I was a little sleepy, a loud noise suddenly woke me up in the afternoon.
Technology itself is not the point, and it understates the possibility that it can be cloned. But then the replicators were rejected by their parents, and they seemed to feel the helplessness of this cloning technology. But it's such an understatement, it just feels like it's describing a fact rather than a critique.
The plot of the son growing up with the mother has a lot of space. I even think this is a mother's love for her son, not a woman's love for a man. After interweaving the son and his girlfriend together, the mother's sadness Instead, what I felt was not the inner sadness of a lover turning into a son. What I thought of was why the mother hates her daughter-in-law so much in reality, and that kind of love is probably a little bit like the feeling of not wanting to be invaded by others. Maybe the director didn't mean to express this meaning, but I think this kind of love is very understandable even if it is not in the context of this cloned lover becoming a son.
At the end the boy is gone, reminds me of the scene where the woman touched her belly and said, at least you left this for me. I think, at least in a woman's eyes, it's perfect, and a woman finally has a baby with someone she loves. Maybe she still loves him as always, no matter whether he is a clone or not, but does he love her too? I don't know, maybe, some playful clips can be understood as he also started to fall in love with her, but the ethics limit has gone? But I prefer to understand that, in fact, he doesn't love her, and is her love for him the same as always? Not really.
Although the replicator has the same appearance and name, but with different experiences, he is no longer him. It is impossible for him to fall in love with you the same, and the one you fall in love with is no longer the original him.
Everyone is unique, and the one you fall in love with is only the present he has been trained by his past experiences, not the unknown him in the future. Although technology is feasible, emotions cannot be transplanted. The sad thing is that people seem to be willing to be obsessed.
I just feel that the overall feeling is a good film, the plot is smooth, not procrastination, and the emotional portrayal is delicate. Although I don't know what the director wants to express, what he wants to convey, and what he wants to reveal, I just have my own feelings. The feeling after watching it.
View more about Womb reviews
