>. Full of warmth is what I felt when I first saw the title of the movie, and I also felt that it should be a family theme that is full of affection and can bring warmth to people after reading the introduction. But after watching it, I just feel that this is not a movie worth savoring at all.
The future of the future has little to do with the future. What seems to be a simple movie with a strong family atmosphere is chaotically interpreted by several inexplicable episodes. Of course, that's not to say there's no merit. Bring some small family problems and solutions to everyone through some chicken soup-like stories. If the director's own intention is to show those 4 or 5-year-old children, and then let them understand the simple phenomena and solutions of family problems, there is no problem, but if the audience is over a certain age, then These things can only have a negative effect and not much reference value. After reading it from start to finish, I felt like I wasted more than an hour.
>. The plot arrangement is completely unreasonable
It was loose before and then tight, and it ended hastily at the end. People can only feel that I don't know what caused such a work to be given so hastily.
The first 30 minutes of the plot seem to deduce the atmosphere of a daily family chores, presenting the jealousy of naive children to the audience. But the solution given turned out to be a farce between a tree with an inexplicable superpower in a garden of less than 30 square meters and a pet dog who somehow realized the true meaning of life.
Could it be that the director felt that when he really encountered this kind of problem, he had to live in a family with a garden and pet dogs? Or do I have to be able to channel myself?
Well, let's ignore the clumsiness of this approach for now. Then look down... well, from the first hallucination, we can receive a message: if you have enough imagination, there will naturally be god-like scenarios to teach you solutions. How can this method be absorbed by audiences of the same age without any reference value at all? Well, we can understand it is just a grandstanding technique. So I can only say that the use of this technique is already well established.
>. Average level of drawing and music
Of course, as I said above, there is no such thing as a completely meaningless movie. In terms of the combination of painting and music, it makes up for some of the malicious fatigue caused by the bad plot. Into the hallucinations and light and shadows and just the right soundtrack makes one barely able to stay in the seat instead of getting up and slamming the door right away.
The painting part is in addition to the family composition that can be reused every time (also let us temporarily forget about the strange house structure and the house husband who is an architect but has no architect style at all). The rest are all in the hallucinations of different styles. In the hallucination, it is natural to think that it is not too much to draw. Of course, we also saw the very abundant imagination of the original painting.
>. cv's deductive ability is mediocre
After reading it, I found that there is no CV performance that can make people savor it carefully. At best, it can only be said that there is no fault, but the brilliant performance is absolutely nothing.
>. In summary
If your family happens to be facing a slightly older child and a newborn baby, and you want to teach them some simple ways to deal with problems through a medium, watch this movie, although It is not possible for parents to gain something, but it is also good to let older children properly understand the handling and resolution of some conflicts.
But please don't go to the cinema, just watch it at home, I believe the price of the digital version of this movie will drop very quickly.
View more about Mirai reviews
