As the title.
I don't watch movies a lot in Japan, but maybe more than ten times. The Japanese have a very good habit of watching movies, that is, they don't leave until the movie credits are finished. I think it's a respect for the hard work of the production team.
I've never seen a situation like this one where so many people left halfway through.
I can understand them, because the protagonist, who is about four years old, was screaming and screaming all the time. No, it's actually the aunt who dubs the four-year-old boy who is trying to imitate the boy's voice and yell. My head almost exploded halfway through.
But I didn't leave halfway through. After all, I watched pv before. In pv, it said that the younger sister who is less than one year old "future" will grow into jk and then travel back to promote the development of the story. At the beginning, jk played once or twice, but the reason was very confusing, and the things he did were also very confusing. Left before seeing enough jk, sorry for my fare.
And then...and then no more. what about jk? Isn't the title of the movie "Future of the Future"? What about the future? Seeing that the four-year-old boy learned to ride a bicycle, suddenly ran to his uncle's house to ride a motorcycle, suddenly got on a train and got lost at the station. What about future roles?
Looking at it from beginning to end, I feel that this is a story of a bear child gradually learning to take responsibility and take care of his sister. Not to mention that jk didn't show up much in the future, and played little role in this process; how did these changes happen in the bear child? Is it relying on his dreamlike experiences? In other words, he matured only through autosuggestion?
Or if those experiences are not dreams but reality, then the motivations of all the participants are completely irrelevant. What's more, these experiences are still separate pieces, is it so difficult to write a complete story?
Someone mentioned that the picture is beautiful. Okay, is "Future of the Future" more beautiful than "Your Name"? Excuse me, is "Future of the Future" more beautiful than "Spring Night is Short, Let's Go Girls"? Is "Future of the Future" more beautiful than "Shape of Sound"? (I don't even want to mention "Leeds and the Blue Bird")
Someone mentioned the finer details. OK, is "Future of the Future" more detailed than "Your Name"? Is "The Future of the Future" more detailed than "The Spring Night is Short, Girls Go Forward"? Is "Future of the Future" more detailed than "Shape of Sound"? (I don't even want to mention "Leeds and the Blue Bird")
Someone mentioned being imaginative. Okay, this time I don't have to mention anyone else's work. May I ask whether the imagination of "Future of the Future" has improved or regressed compared to "Summer Wars"? The station section is really good, but the plot of that section itself doesn't make sense, and the imagination can't talk about it.
Someone who has mentioned parenting experience will understand. Okay, if that's the case, please don't use jk as a gimmick to promote it, and state "please watch this film after your second child, sir".
Also, I actually don't quite understand why Grandpa (Zeng) was set as a World War II veteran.
After talking for so long, I was actually shocked when I saw the rating of 7.0. The level of this animation is far from the passing line, how can it still have a 7.0 rating. Looking at the comments carefully, I feel that what everyone said is actually very pertinent. The opinions are mainly based on criticism, and they also involve all aspects that make me feel uncomfortable. But after everyone finished criticizing, they all gave three or four stars very kindly, which made me not quite understand.
The Japanese side is also promoting the film with "Your Name"-level announcements.
Everyone is really kind to Supervisor Hosoda Mamoru.
So be it.
View more about Mirai reviews
