When the same knife as the murder weapon appears out of thin air, when the story is told with mournful music, I have begun to doubt the director, but after everyone has reached a consensus of innocence, the plot will be Let me be sure it's a big piece of shit.
These 12 people, like bonsai, are twisted people who grew up in a twisted environment, stupid, arrogant, cynic, conspiracy theories, racist, cranky, shameless...
each based on their own experience, not The facts of the case itself are used to determine the guilt or innocence of the accused.
The person who initially supported innocence said he didn't know if the defendant was innocent, but just thought everyone should take the verdict seriously. This is correct, but what he did later was not to judge guilt or innocence based on the facts, but to find materials to support his point of view and convince others when he was found innocent.
The cemetery manager confidently said how he cheated people, proudly said how he used the money to donate to schools and do good deeds, instead of being ashamed, he was proud.
The most vehement supporter of the guilty taxi driver, who beat his son at the instigation of his stepmother, believes that the female witness also falsely accused the defendant out of jealousy.
There may be a thousand possibilities, but I don't care, only what I have experienced happens, and what happens to me happens to others. How stupid this is!
If it only talked about human nature in a distorted environment, it might still be a good film, but the end of the film overturned this possibility, but affirmed the 12 people through the mouth of the jury team leader, thinking that they judged the defendant's innocence. All are right, think they are benevolent, this group leader gives more exaggerated reasons for his guilt, baseless belief that the accused adoptive father was murdered, the child is likely to be in danger if he does not go to jail, let him Enter the prison, find out the truth, and then release it. This really makes me dumbfounded. You think this is just playing a house, and you only talk about values and emotions in complete disregard of the facts. It really makes people feel like a scholar meets a soldier!
Later, in order to prove himself in the movie, the child's adoptive father was indeed murdered, and the juror team leader turned into a hero. To adopt the child and avenge him, it will really sublimate, and it will become legendary all of a sudden (this is ironic) . The seemingly thought-provoking subtitle at the end is a joke.
View more about 12 reviews
