What had a profound impact was that after the court adjourned, the female witness asked the bailiff, can I go first? The bailiff replied, "No, this is the rule.
I I thought that if the "rules" were poured out so casually and naturally, I would see if other "rules" would appear later; then a series of rules appeared, put away the communication device, and locked them in the room, and they must be unanimously approved.
I also want to talk about the later stories in detail, but someone in the comments has recorded everyone's stories in detail. When I watched the movie, I also randomly memorized some key words, which is the place where they conflicted during the debate.
Human vs Watermelon
An angry man said, which is the story told by the first person to object, you bought a watermelon at a watermelon store, the owner guaranteed that the melon was cooked and sweet, but when you went home and cut the melon, it was bad , what should I do? Throw it away. But the suspect in the case is an individual. What if it is unanimously approved that he is guilty but finds that he is a good man? A watermelon can be thrown away if it is cut and broken, but if a person is convicted of murder, he will be imprisoned for life.
Secret Voting vs public voting
There is suddenly an acquittal vote, making the original 1:11 to 2:10, just because there is an objection and a watermelon example in front of a person to join the acquittal. Over there. A
certain party vs Chechens
later mentioned someone's comment on a certain party, "xxx is not a good thing". One of the 12 angry men immediately argued that his father was a certain party cadre and worked hard to retire. I didn't enjoy any privileges during my tenure, and I died of illness 3 months after retirement. There are similar comments in the movie, that is, the Chechens should be damned, and then the xx people are uncivilized, etc. This kind of comment is almost impossible In order to discuss the suspicious points of the case, the suspect is Chechen and can't speak Russian, and most of the Chechens are Caucasian. This has nothing to do with whether the suspect really kills. What does this mean?
Jealousy vs hope (to achieve a certain purpose) )
When it comes to jealousy, there are only 3 or 4 people left in the angry man who just thought they were guilty. what is it Some angry men's disgust for Chechens and a certain ethnic group hope to be released by convicting the suspect. Although they know that the suspect is not a member of the Chechens or a certain ethnic group who has harmed them. Jealousy can cause damage to others. Catastrophic consequences.
TV series (movie) vs real events
When they simulate a crime scene to prove the testimony of a party old man wrong, the cynical angry man simulates a murder for a Harvard angry man, the method is cruel, plot It was only revealed at the end, because it was a comedy no matter how you heard it at the beginning. The Harvard angry man had to go to the bathroom to vomit, but after everyone was worried, he slowly said after returning, this is the last episode of the seventh season of a TV series. , and this show is the TV show where Harvard Angry Man works. This plot makes me think, will this movie also be like the last episode of a certain series in the movie, it is a virtual event, a false event What? To be honest, the boundaries between reality and entertainment programs are difficult to distinguish. It is also difficult to cut across the board. After entertainment, you'd better keep a realistic heart. 1:11
vs 11:1
Guilty vs. 11 other Angry Men who are guilty and 11 Angry Men who are found innocent against a painter who is guilty Or sit at the table and enforce the rules at the beginning - the resolution must be unanimous.
Can this be the reality, I'm thinking? Let the "non-professional" jury patiently serve an unrelated suspect who looks like a straight-forward convict It takes more than two hours to argue?
I think it would be good for such 12 angry men to make up the 6 angry men in them
View more about 12 reviews
