1. The last question "If kindness is beyond the law...", the feeling is that people give the boy a chance to be free because of kindness. But the boy is innocent, and if the law is fair, the boy should be free. Why mention "kindness"?
2. If it is really kind, why did the other 11 people, except Nikolai, not continue to be kind to give the boy a good living condition after hearing that the boy was likely to be killed, but instead began to shirk their responsibilities. In particular, the juror who initially found the boy innocent makes him so out of line with the character created at the beginning of the film.
3. Nikolai already knew that if the boy took revenge, he would probably be killed by a black-hearted real estate agent, so why not stop him and encourage him to take revenge? He shouldn't have particularly good conditions to protect the boy himself.
4. At first, the jurors who thought the boy was innocent took back the Maria statue that was forgotten on the cabinet. It felt like the director wanted to give the bird an opportunity to fly back into the snow, which was too slow. And what is the purpose of letting the bird fly into the gym?
Hope that the experts advise!
View more about 12 reviews
