The first half of the hostess set up okay, especially like the eyes without emotion. The second half is neither high-function nor anti-social, and has become a mediocre character like a supporting role.
As for the story itself, I don't see so many loving family and love. Deconstructing the essence of the feeling is about cannibalism. Two people with appetite (a high-functioning sociopathic heroine and an autistic selfish brother) co-parasitize a cowardly old carer under various names, forming a so-called "home". "——This "home" is the most justifiable combination for parasitism.
cure? There are a few moments. But it is more of a need (or called parasitism), because this "appetite" is not only a survival need, but also an emotional need (a requirement for temperature).
Sadly it still feels out of place. If the story is about a high-functioning anti-social novelist, the heroine uses unconventional methods to cure mentally ill patients (there is a trend in the previous cases), and the hero assists and provides ordinary people's interpretation and emotional value (one is Sherlock, the other is Watson. ), such a narrative template is still very attractive. It's very cliché to make a family happy. After all, "home" is the source of healing and nightmares. In the end, only describing "love" and "beautiful" has no thickness.
View more about It's Okay to Not Be Okay reviews