A story of two (brothers), four (plus mom and dad), or even five (and one in the circus) tigers. The part of the little tiger growing up is especially like a documentary technique. Not only is it so simple, it is also very similar to a fantasy film, because the tigers in the film are all human-like, and the animal nature is completely weakened, which is really imaginative. The effect of this anthropomorphic method is not bad, it is very entertaining, and it also creates a lot of tears. It seems to shorten the distance between the audience and the ferocious beast like a tiger. Natural distance, but the results flow to the surface. Because, in addition to the detailed depiction of the tiger, the characters in the film are very indistinct, so the emotional communication between the human and the tiger is also relatively rough, and the effect of this "closer" is naturally unsatisfactory. You may think that this is a movie about tigers in itself, but some of the plots of human beings are somewhat unclear, such as the hidden feelings of the mayor's wife to the hunters, which are inexplicable without a head and no tail. It doesn't make much sense. Although there are some bugs, the film can be made. I believe the crew must have put in a lot of effort. After all, it is too difficult to make an animal film, especially when there are so many tigers, they have to be made to look like people.
View more about
Two Brothers reviews