partisanship

Evan 2022-03-27 09:01:21

It took a lot of time for a dull movie, but I finally finished watching it. The plot was relatively fragmented, and the first half was not very coherent. If Citizen Kane's expenses have bankrupted the producer, this is The cost of a film may be more; such a large scene, so many people, it is really too much investment; like other silent films, the action of the performance is too exaggerated, after all, there are intermittent subtitles.

Angelina 2022-04-24 07:01:25

Godard said: The movie starts with Griffith and ends with Kiarostami. In fact, Griffiths invented every trick of storytelling. He helped build the myth of cinema. Compared with the racist tendencies that caused major criticism in "The Birth of a Nation", Griffith made timely remediation and corrections in "Party Dissent". And it almost became the first non-linear narrative film in film history. At that time, such a complex structure and super-long film set were difficult for the movie audience and market at that time to digest. With four stories spanning more than 2000 years, Griffith unabashedly conveyed his artistic ambitions and political ideals to the audience, a view that most historians agree with today: it was Griffith His artistic ambition, rather than pure originality, put him ahead of the filmmakers of his time. But whether it is the creation of the times or the drive of personal ambition. The status of "Party to Fight Differing" in the history of film is unshakable. Griffith was the first director to use all of his cinematic techniques in a systematic and harmonious way.