One is too unlikely.
I've heard of animal stars before. I don't know how much better the treatment of animal stars will be compared to the animals in the circus in the film.
I don't know if animal stars will be the same as human stars (objective comparison) and will be happy for their fame.
I think animals should have their own look in the world. rather than what people think.
The film moved me a lot. I can't help but admit that it moved me to tears. After the father tiger (or the mother tiger, I can't tell the difference) was hit by a pig gun and fell down, the little tiger still got under its body to avoid humans. . This scene made me see the meaning of "depending on". It should be the instinct of animals to look for dependence, including people.
The tigers and performances in the film are full of humanity. I want to ask, is this really the case with tigers? Can tigers in nature recognize their childhood brothers with a look in memory when they grow up? Too dramatic, too human.
Respect for other species should respect their nature, we can't ask them to be the same as humans, right?
View more about Two Brothers reviews
