Absolutely professional legal film, I really hope that every student studying law can watch it. We cannot change reality, but we cannot easily be changed by reality. Is it a luxury to have the last dignity and sense of justice before the law? Will you sue the wicked? Would you like to be their lawyer? What if it is in front of huge amounts of money? The few shots Rudy fought were justified and there was nothing wrong with it. Claire should have completely beaten her husband to death in the end, it should be illegal. This film is written by an expert! I see their references to legal terms, terminology, and court rules, and I am extremely excited! How much sobriety and strong will a person have to remind oneself not to be stuck in the mud? How much courage and brutal self-control are necessary to refuse all the benefits that are readily available when you cross the boundaries lightly? The ideals and enthusiasm of the young lawyer in the film are indeed very touching and precious; however, what we should pay more attention to is not who he chooses to speak for and what kind of interests he speaks for, but his careful work and his face. Responsible attitude towards the parties. Because the judicial system itself is antagonistic, facts and justice can only emerge more clearly after the confrontation of opinions. No lawyer is qualified to stand on the commanding heights of morality and first examine the client before deciding whether he is willing to act. Its endorsement. In fact, such an act of wise protection is actually very selfish. On the other hand, no matter how sinful and ugly an individual or organization is, it should also have the right to enjoy fair, just and reasonable treatment by the judicial system, and lawyers, as a component of the judicial apparatus, should be treated under any circumstances and when facing anyone. They are all responsible for fulfilling their obligations and completing their own work-this is the most basic moral requirement of a lawyer. What's more, speaking for the devil does not mean that you have to become the devil yourself. You can still only tell the truth when defending a liar. I remember that when freshman was on the "British Judicial System", there was a special lesson on the professional ethics of judicial workers. The first requirement for lawyers is the so-called "Cab rank rule": lawyers and clients are like taxis. The relationship between the driver and the passenger, or the relationship between the doctor and the patient, the lawyer cannot refuse to represent anyone, just as the driver cannot refuse to carry, the doctor cannot see that the patient is a murderer and will not save him.
Regarding more professional films on legal subjects, court debates, juries, judges, lawyers, and clients, honestly I don’t know how professional they are. It’s just that everyone says that, and I don’t know much, so just pretend to be a professional film. !
Contradiction: Will you help the poor in a lawsuit? Will you sue the bad guys? Will you go to court for justice? It's hard to say whether you can stick to something that seems simple.
The whole film is quite boring, watching and wanting to sleep, the plot is too flat, the quality of the film is not good, and it is silly. The person who was killed didn't quite understand what to do. Is it all right? The lawyer hit someone but didn't give an explanation. What did you want to do? Just defend it!
View more about The Rainmaker reviews
