As a Chinese without a refugee issue, the most incomprehensible thing about this film is why refugees are so arrogant? Why does the president tell a citizen that you and refugees are brothers?
If you are naturalized, OK, then we are brothers; but you are not native at all, who gave you the courage to condemn the Lebanese people for supporting Israel? In other words, what if I support you? It's a good intention to accept you, don't really take yourself as a master, and also "our territory". Moreover, Jordan slaughtered Palestinian refugees in the country (both civilians and armed elements). That is the internal affairs of other countries. Can you control it? The female lawyer, looking like a messenger of justice, denounced the Jordanians for their incompetence. In addition, refugees must be punished for maiming Jordanians. The president is also crazy to speak for the refugees, with his elbows turned out, what the Lebanese said to the president is not wrong.
Is the final verdict kidding me? At least they have to bear civil liability to lose money, right?
This is a really good refusal education film, it's horrible, it's a farmer and a snake, and it messes up its own country. Why does Lebanon admit refugees to their own fault? The celestial dynasty must never accept refugees, a certain line of religion is enough of a headache.
The film is given full marks. The consistent feature of Middle Eastern films is that they focus on the small things in the life of the leopard. There is no bad person but moral dilemma. However, they can't really sympathize with the refugees.
PS: I have a feeling that the legal system in Lebanon is highly developed. If there is any disagreement, I will hire a lawyer, and the court duel is straightforward. . . . Really. . . .
View more about The Insult reviews
