1. You just owe me an apology (قضية رقم ٢٣ , 2017) formerly known as Case No. 23. At the beginning of the film, the world is peaceful and inclusive, while the protagonist is full of anger; at the end of the film, the world is noisy, emotional and intolerant, and the protagonist has peace of mind. 2. The gap between the two protagonists is so deep that mutual understanding is impossible; the most delicate part of the plot is the design that builds a bridge between the two protagonists, so that the two sides have a basis for dialogue, one of which was discussed in court The plaintiff found that he had the same view as the defendant on "the craftsmanship made in Germany is better". Second, when he met with the president about the "diligent work attitude", the defendant found that the plaintiff had the same view as himself, and even to defend him. These trivial things are the possible opportunities for reconciliation. 3. The attitude of the East is to make great things disappear, "to achieve neutrality, the status of the heavens, and the creation of all things", while the attitude of the West is to create something out of nothing, to interpret and interpret as much information as possible. 4. An important sentence in the conclusion is: No one bears the pain alone. (No one has the unique suffering. ) The real situation is that the source of a person’s emotions never belongs to the individual. People have “social character” on the basis of “human nature”, because in a complex society, people cannot escape from economic production methods, history, religion, culture, The influences of political consciousness, law and morality. In addition to this, there is the inflated imagination, born of fear and loneliness, which influences our consciousness in a very light way. The film inserts these details into the plot structure and analyzes it well. 5. The surprise attack in the movie lies in the scene where Yasser apologizes to Tony. Apology is an inevitable result, but the way of apologizing is an unexpected plot, which is the climax of the movie. That's why, in the episode of Qipa saying "Should you be bullied or sue the teacher", my point of view is: even if you fight back, you have to tell the teacher first, and then fight back. "A tooth for a tooth, an eye for an eye" is a rational and fair punishment type in the classical period. Moreover, violence is still a way to resolve disputes (such as wars after negotiation fails). If a scholar encounters a soldier, it will be unreasonable to be reasonable. Makes sense, but it's important to give more time to gain understanding before retaliating, which is why the movie schedules offense and defense in court. After the climax, the epilogue continued, so the procedures on the system side were the same, but the words of the judge in the court were also interesting: the reason for the acquittal came from both parties being guilty. 6. At the end of the film, we see a vision: the country under construction (Figure 1). I think the attitude of the film is very positive.
View more about The Insult reviews
