1. The characters appear, the scenes are the same at the beginning and the end, the title is tight, the relationship between the characters brings out the role of the mother, the scene of the dog suddenly rushing in, the rewards of patience and luck, the market, the sale, the hair dye and the fan.
2. Outsiders, trailers and catching cattle, nomadic, noisy, impetuous, the family interacts with cattle very clumsily. In the first stage, seeing the integration, looking at the camera, the woman is watching from a distance, vigilant and guarding, the turning point is very fast, the childless woman and the neighbor are integrated without any obstacles, because of the arrival of these children, life is moistened Get up, the two night chat scenes at this stage are used separately, with a false alarm scene where my sister goes into the water. Cut it in half and put it here. I want to say that the child is very easy to die here. Her two sisters both died prematurely. If the plot does not have to go on like this, the play here does not play a role in the plot. It can be extended a little more. The audience feels a little bit better, but they cut the camera after speaking, making them so anxious, not to mention that this should start to pave the way for the turning point, it seems that someone has been fooled, and I don't have the information I want, so give me a story about children The information that is easy to die; in the second stage, the foreshadowing is not done well, any change seems sudden, outsiders start to raise bees, the woman does not show nervousness about her bees being violated, some vigilance will not destroy the character, the director has both There is no woman's attitude towards this matter, and the woman's perspective is still missing. Entering the perspective of an outsider, and then returning to the perspective of a woman through the differences within the outsider's family, this turning point is too unexpected and sudden. The characteristics of the whole film, from the perspective of the characters and the lens, are amazing, but from the perspective of the plot, it is extremely cliché, every step is guessed, and the beautiful scenery is boring because it falls into the cliché; the third stage, breaking, foreign She stole her honey. From the point of view of the documentary, the most dramatic part is, ah, what did the film crew shoot? They didn’t put down the camera to stop this, and they didn’t rush to call her. After calming down, she Isn't there other hives? There is no fierce conflict. If you want to tell the story in a dramatic way, these questions, just complaining about this scene with her mother is really not enough, just like the babysitter in "Roma" , after being filtered through the brains of middle-class intellectuals, she can overturn the milk fed to her mother, and she can also be hysterical. If you want a plot, please be intense. If you can't do it, please don't let the audience expect the story, the film Much of the weakness that followed was the story being seen through. If the story follows the characters, the climax is her crying with her mother, but the story here is separated from the characters and moves to an issue level that is higher than the characters and higher than life. This is also my question, and I feel cheated. Split.
3. The outsider left and the mother passed away. I really disliked this episode with too delicate and ingenious material integration, which ruined the rough aesthetic of the documentary, the characters were too delicate, spilled milk accelerated mood swings, the radio called my mother and no one responded, and The scene of driving away the wolves with a torch in the back has a strong sense of design. If the director did not film the death of his mother, it would be alright to make up for it. If he did, just delete this scene because it was too direct, okay.
4. At the end, the shot is too beautiful, but the ending is too bad. Like the essay on Reader's Digest more than ten years ago, it uses such a big brush to tell a skinny truth. I don't know if it sacrificed the heroine or made the heroine. This way of telling the story, attaching characters to social issues or environmental issues, is very North American style, such a beautiful film, why not make it in Europe and make it into "Treasure Island", shortlisted in Cannes? Is it much worse than nominated for an Oscar?
More than 2000 hours of material, is this a bonus item?
Suspect
I never feel that this type of documentary is very dramatic, which is a commendable thing.
Everyday life is shaved off the mystery by the plot.
This kind of approach is quite the style of the producer, and genius is rare, especially in documentaries.
View more about Honeyland reviews
