It's a completely different movie from The Shawshank Redemption. The film mainly tells the story of how five felons dug a tunnel to escape. The tunnel was successfully dug out, and it took the strength of five people. Among them, Roland made the greatest contribution because he had three successful escapes from prison. It's a pity that after the tunnel was dug through, Gio gave up his escape; and the newly joined young man Claude was interviewed by the warden the day before and told his wife that the lawsuit had been withdrawn. Claude returned to the cell, and the inmates asked why he stayed with the warden for 2 hours... He said that the warden was questioning the details of his imprisonment...... The next day, everyone started When the prison escaped, all the prison guards were already guarding the door... The prison guards and wardens in the film were all friendly, and they did not bully the prisoners aggressively or violently, nor did they use any means to get rid of the prisoners. Conspiracy the prisoner. I thought that the guards who kept spiders would use spiders to torture the prisoners, but they didn't... The prisoners also seemed very kind. Except for the cigarettes and stamps stolen by the plumber, the guards acquiesced that they would punish the plumber violently. There's no such thing as overly aggressive words. There are a few things I don't understand: 1. The car repair man at the beginning of the film is Roland among the prisoners. ——Does this mean that they are all released, only when they are released can they work leisurely, otherwise they can only hide in fear. 2. This group of felons is so incompetent? As soon as Claude was transferred to their cell, after a few words, he was so friendly to him? It's sharing bread and ice cream, and it's telling them that they are planning to dig a tunnel to escape the secret. No matter what, we have to get along for a while, let's talk about being a human being, right? No matter how anxious you are to escape from prison, saving that little time is more important than everyone's life safety? 3. The film did not explain why they escaped underground. Maybe they had already figured out the terrain before. 4. The iron bed of the cell was not dismantled, and the escape weapon was easily obtained on the iron bed. 5. Claude lived in cell 8 before, It was said to be a decoration, but there was no decoration, because after meeting with his sister-in-law, he was depressed and accidentally returned to Building 8, where everything was normal. Claude has no right to choose a cell, and it is naturally up to the prison guards to decide where to go. Why let him go to cell 6 on the 11th floor? There must be a purpose for this. There is no clip in the film that he colluded with the warden, or that the warden used him or anyone's foreshadowing. This requires the audience to guess by themselves. Didn't report it? Because everyone is passing on tools for committing crimes, everyone is thinking about jailbreaking. 7. The warden has told Claude that his wife withdraws the lawsuit, which means freedom. Why does he still escape? 10 years in prison for withdrawing the lawsuit? Is there such a statement? Do the inmates actually believe it? Even if you get ten years in prison, you can still get a commutation of your sentence if you behave well. A few years in prison can get you a lifetime of peace. You don't have to escape from prison, but is it better to be wanted all over the world and live in hiding? After all, this prison does not have the unrestricted imprisonment of Shawshank Prison, and the phenomenon of continuous abuse and exploitation of labor force 8. Some people say that Roland is the betrayal? From the beginning to the end, there is not a single shot of Roland having any contact with the prison guard or the warden. How could he become a betrayal? On the whole, I still prefer "The Shawshank Redemption". The story is rich and full, and the characters are well portrayed. With eyes closed, I can distinguish the characteristics of each person. And Shawshank's escape will make people applaud, because the male protagonist was originally wronged and imprisoned, but the brutality and money addiction of the warden and prison guards made the prisoners who should be paroled sit in prison for 10 years after 10 years. Wearing, even killing prisoners who are not executed, just to let the male protagonist stay in prison forever to work for their money, escape is a resistance under this closed and unequal system. But what about the cave escape? Are you expecting their jailbreak to succeed or fail? What points in the film make you relish?
View more about Le Trou reviews
