Beth borrowed the hands of others to execute the scumbag, and everyone applauded, but what if the scumbag wasn't such a complete scumbag? If the scumbag didn't kill his daughter, or cheated on so many women, and only cheated on April, would there still be so many people supporting Beth's murder? Or, Beth, will she still kill her husband?
No way, if Rob wasn't so cruel and Beth killed him, I'm sure there will be a bunch of people defending him, calling Beth the most poisonous woman's heart, and some even saying that he only cheated on April when he raised his family. Peerless good man!
If the rationality for a woman to kill her husband is based on her husband's heinous crime, is this rationality equivalent to another kind of shackles?
View more about Why Women Kill reviews
