One of the biggest questions I had at the time was who was the youngest little prince who indirectly killed Charles IX? Since the death of Catherine's husband, Henry II, the Loireau royal family has only three direct line kings, namely Francois II, Charles IX and Henry III. There is no fourth prince from De'Medici who will eventually become king (otherwise where would Henry IV come from?). When Queen Margot appeared, Charles IX was already in power, so it can be seen that François was dead. In this way, there should probably only be two princes in the royal family. Among these two princes, Louis (the Duke of Orleans who died early) died before the age of one year, so this person was excluded - so, the little prince who murdered at the age of 17 should be Prince Hercules, who had not changed his name back then, that is, after the name change François of Loyalou, Duke of Lançon. It stands to reason that this person should be the legitimate heir after Henry's death, but how does the fourth emperor's enthronement make sense?
It was later discovered that Anjou, who had deliberately killed Charlie in the Queen Margot, died in June 1584, before his brother Henry in 1589 (in other words, Charlie's death did not directly benefit Alençon, mainly due to the order of succession). ties) so that after Henry's death there was no longer a Loire with a legal right of inheritance. Therefore it is reasonable.
View more about Queen Margot reviews
