I'm sorry, I can't really be moved by sensibility like me.
Frankly speaking, no matter how bad the filming of such a subject is, I will cry. But that's all.
The most insincere part of this film is that everything is sensationalized for the sake of sensationalism. It painstakingly prepared all the tear-jerking elements - mental retardation, father and daughter, unjust case, death penalty... Only the real emotion is missing.
The characterization is so weak and weak, and the plot is so simple and deliberate that it cannot stand scrutiny. It seems that the screenwriter and director are desperately cheering behind the scenes: "A little more warmth here, let them cry!" "Be pitiful here, let them cry. !" There is no logic and no truth.
Especially when the actress who played adult Yisheng was in a crying scene, she was afraid that the real crying would look ugly and she cried until she stopped, and when she kept her beautiful expression even when she was crying, she was not only disappointed, but also disappointed. There is anger.
This is the most extreme moment in the whole film.
Some say she restrained her tears and expressions because she was in court. But do you know what "restraint" is? Look at the last expression of Will Smith in "When Happiness Knocks on the Door", what is called "trying to restrain the gushing emotion". Just one expression can let the audience read too many stories and emotions, and evoke too many resonances and responses from the audience.
British and American dramas are attractive because they are not only clever writers, but also sincere actors. They are good at making false stories and emotions feel real.
And the clumsy emotional drama will only give people the feeling that "the director has just called the action actors to finish this scene and then they can go to the lunch box".
View more about Miracle in Cell No. 7 reviews
