It's not like the Indian movies that I expected from my impression, showing the national culture and making people think. Although it also embodies the spirit of unyielding and resolute resistance of the Indians, it is more for the purpose of expressing Frankie, his cunning and treacherousness. exist. Although the protagonist is a national treasure-level actor Aamir Khan, such a plot is indeed very unpleasant, and it is impossible to enter the play. I was thinking about how it could be like this throughout the whole process. Is this really possible? The protagonist simply wants the wind to be the wind and the rain to the rain. If he wants to sleep, someone will hand him a pillow, and he will play everyone in the palm of his hand with one mouth. What's annoying is that these people have been played so many times, and they still don't. can trust him. There are also loopholes in the plot. For example, Frankie caused the British to suffer such a big loss. The British could actually let him go and even reward him for his freedom. Although he has made great contributions, but such a person Shouldn't he be under control? At least he has to be monitored, and he even let him release all the people in prison; how could he make so many medicated snacks when he was in prison; a group of people In the Englishman's arsenal as if he were so comfortable in his own back garden that no one found it; even when the war was fought, the Englishman did not doubt him.
In short, the plot is too idealized, reversed for the sake of reversal, funny for the sake of being funny, happy ending for the sake of happy ending, which makes the whole movie seem nondescript.
View more about Thugs of Hindostan reviews
