When I was buying a CD at school, a little girl next to me yelled, "Oh, this movie is so good! I'm crying! I want my classmates to bring me one from France..." And so on. So I bought it and took a look. I can't find any other points except for the cuteness. Then I understand that the aesthetic level of the students in the film school is also very different.
I've always believed that a good work of art (including a film) allows the audience to have opposing perspectives. Like Wong Kar Wai. But for me, it is difficult for me to call a film with problems in the script as a "good film", even if the mouse is drawn cutely. I remember last week the teacher also said that crying or not can not be used as a standard to measure the quality of a movie, some people are born to cry. The first time I thought about this question was after reading Feng Xiaogang's "Tangshan Earthquake". Think about it carefully, if you go into the cinema to watch a movie, as long as you cry, you must think it is a good movie? As far as I know, 90% of the lay audience does think so. But in other words, how can one rate a movie as "good"? Is it good that the audience thinks it is good, or is it good that the professional film critics approve of it? In the history of movies, there is often a phenomenon of "applause but not good", and there is almost no film that "applauds and hits". What causes this phenomenon? Is there really something wrong with the minds of filmmakers?
After my repeated thinking, I think the key to the existence of this problem lies in the particularity of film art. It is both art and a commodity. Some people regard it as art, and more people regard it as a commodity for their own entertainment. You people in the film industry are so arrogant and arrogant that they think you are doing a noble art career, but what is the difference between the work of a prostitute and a prostitute? It's all for entertainment. Many times when I see a movie playing on a long-distance bus, I feel that this is a very sad thing. I can't see clearly, the screen is full of back lights, and I can't hear it. It's not as loud as the roar of the engine. What is a movie? The definition of a movie is a film that is viewed collectively on the big screen. A small foreshadowing that many directors and screenwriters have racked their brains for has passed between the car and the screen. I didn't see this feature for a while, and I didn't hear that line for a while. After a while eating something, or simply getting out of the car for a walk, it is impossible for the audience to feel its goodness after such a movie, and the audience has never had any experience of being entertained or educated. And experiments have shown that the effect of playing movies in the car is far less than that of entertainment programs or even TV dramas. Video programs that do not involve coherence and concentration are clearly more dominant.
View more about Ernest & Celestine reviews
