The film is too clean, and I am reluctant to use the standards of the adult world to comment, nor dare.
The tone of this film is "small and fresh", most of the actors are "children", gender identity "minor obstacles", "little troubles" in the process of growth, and "little frictions" in getting along with others. Naturally, let him go. Nature lets us do this, and personality lets us continue, so what else do you say, just bless yourself.
Innate, a person is born with a disposition, a psychological perception characteristic and behavioral tendency that cannot be changed by the outside world, or nature. (Shameless ferry, cheap hands, nature)
Sex, the physiological needs of human organs after maturity. (We don't make up words, just say "sex" and that "sex". This is not cheap = =)
In the film, Laure (Michael) "naturally" makes the development of the film and the atmosphere of the story logical. The development of the whole film is: moving, Laure's appearance "transgender", making friends, disguising, apologizing, reconciling (although I didn't say it, but who doesn't know, right) The whole story is relatively flat (when I was a child, it was always intense. A rich heart. Although a child's undeveloped brain can't tell himself what he's thinking. But he can tell himself what I want to do and what I don't want to do.) The twists and turns of the story appear in two places: one is that he pretended to be Michael The younger sister found out, and the second is that Lisa knew the fact that she was a girl. Although these problems are thrown out, she can resolve them. Because of her "natural nature", she has to be kind and harmless, and even more masculine than boys of the same age. She can fight for her sister when she is bullied. Best friends and Lisa dance and play together in the house, and can also be better than them at the projects that boys are good at. She is understandably a "real boy" who "gets the scene and gets the boudoir". The younger sister loves Michael because she is a "brother" who can protect herself. Lisa is attracted by her "manly" heavier than boys, and even if she can't accept Markle's deception, she can't give up a friend who is both caring and charming.
Laure is not a "gender identity disorder" because he just yearns for being a boy and being able to experience the joys of a boy's world. These wishes did not become obstacles to her spiritual, psychological, cognitive and growth. I remember reading a comic called "Is God's Prank" a long time ago. When it comes to gender inversion, it is more like a prank of natural science. It is nonsense to say that it does not conform to general moral cognition. I believe that we will wait until human beings explore more. In the era of , cognition, and inclusion of new things, most of these existing values that have been characterized have become bullshit. Dare you say it's right? At least it's not wrong until it can't be proven right. Affirmation of oneself can better improve the personality and body and mind. Too many obstacles from parents and society will only make normal become "abnormal".
Let's go a long way, and say whether to impose the standards of the adult world on this film, well, let's not talk about it.
I am struggling to find some reasons to convince myself to talk about it freely, but I find that when I talk too much, it turns sour.
If we analyze the causes of Laure's character from the family background. There's no need for that, because in this film, the environment obviously doesn't matter much. And the reason why this child is so attractive is that, just like the protagonist "Tomboy" Flower in "IS God's Mischief", he has a fairly happy family, and everything does not seem so depressing and bad, but natural. Her existence breaks gender boundaries and breaks many routines, so that people cannot be admired and envied by the "freedom" she exudes.
Looking at the film, it is estimated that most people will think of "Boys Don't Cry". Although the protagonists are also tomboys, there will also be girls who love them in the story. The heart of a man", but the difference is not the appearance of the ending, but one that tells you what "nature" and "pure child's world" are, and the other is to let you see the conflict between "nature" and the real society, let you I know that there is a reality called "helplessness", and some phenomena are called "fuck".
One added "sex" because there was always a need for organs after they matured, and one added "beautiful innocence", putting plasticine in their panties to be JJ. Whether it's "sex" or "nature," they don't conflict. Nature tells me that I should do this, so I can choose the sex object by myself. Nature tells me to do what I want, not illegal, not passive, neither humble nor arrogant, not to stop just because of the other person's sex, and not to intentionally hurt anyone , I think these are some of the elements of being a healthy person.
If the protagonist of Boys Don't Cry was not born in an era when there were so many violent British people, but lived in Switzerland, even if her way of life is difficult to admit, at least everyone will not see such a tragic ending. But no matter what, everyone will die, just in a slightly different way. Why be sad about other people's tragedies, right?
As for "sex", I think anything that is not based on emotion is hooliganism. It's blatant rape, crime, and "sex" without preconditions, so I can't comment. At least this film is not yet "mature", and it is not involved. Taking it as a topic just can't find words, I'm not Baidu, I'm not responsible.
PS: I have some opinions on Baidu Encyclopedia. The information on this film cannot be found. Am I being too stupid? Am I being too stupid? It's your eunuch.
In fact, this film doesn't have any good reviews. I've been talking nonsense for a long time. Anyway, you have watched it. I just want to say: "It's natural, let him go."
View more about Tomboy reviews