interesting

Cheyenne 2022-04-21 09:03:52

It's a very funny movie. The funny thing here is that after laughing, you can still feel some aftertaste. This is a good laugh, not a bad laugh that only feels sour after laughing. It is estimated that it will not survive the first 37 minutes, why there is such a stupid director, shoddy production is the best explanation for the first 37 minutes, and he also uses the so-called one-shot gimmick to deceive the audience. However, when you endure the painful time in front of you, you will usher in a brand new situation. It turns out that all the loopholes and plots have a reasonable foreshadowing and perfect docking without gaps. Have to admire the talent of the director.

View more about One Cut of the Dead reviews

Extended Reading
  • Jean 2022-04-06 09:01:07

    Normally, a 30-minute long shot should be a masterpiece of dazzling skills enough to be remembered in the history of photography, but that AV-level acting, sloppy ghost story, shoddy zombie short film with pure blood and female body is really... see When I ran out to End Credit, I just thought my day was over. But he was pulled back immediately, no, why did he end credit after only 30 minutes? Only then did I realize that I had been pulled into a meta-carnival comedy. The usual plot twist only spends the last 5 minutes to "get the truth", here is a full 60 minutes of "the truth", only to find out that the front There are traces of everything wrong with the company, that is, the luxurious accident package, everything that can be wrong is wrong. But watching them try their best to save the movie, no one is willing to call the card directly, and they gradually feel that the thing at the beginning is rotten, but if you turn around and watch the back of the movie and are willing to peel off the cameras layer by layer, you are in In addition to laughing, you may find yourself a little sore nose, and some want to cry

  • Freda 2022-04-11 09:01:07

    Pleasant but disliked. If "Shadow" and "Zhang Yimou and His Shadow" are tied to one ticket and sold in a hall, the experience brought to the audience will not be much different from this film. Isn't the sensationalism law of "We work hard so we endure it", in a certain sense, isn't it also inciting the audience to transfer the interpretation power they should have to the crew that may not have a reason or even a real misery? I feel sorry for Shi Yun's "Insects in the World". In the same way, he did everything possible to avoid such sensationalism, but he did not expect the audience to be so voluntarily deceived by its tricks...