Two and a half stars, I really can't accept the heroine pretending to be someone else's identity and then using the dream as an excuse to clean up. In such a short period of time, from zero foundation to the stage, the teacher is partial all the way, what is not Mary Sue? The housekeeper was a ballet dancer who was left with a lame leg as a theatre cleaner? The heroine didn't see the housekeeper for a long time and asked the reason for the lame leg, did she poke her heart? The orphanage teachers and nuns are actually good people. You run away, escape, what are you running for, or do you need to overcome obstacles to realize your dreams, and the orphanage is set as the first obstacle? The previous situation did not explain enough about the orphanage. This setting is unreasonable. I don't think the protagonist has the courage. I just feel rampant and inexplicable. The whole film didn't feel the meaning of ballet to the heroine until the end, and most of the previous part only talked about dreams and dreams, to be realized, to stand on the stage to shine, very empty, can be replaced by any "dream", painting, writing and There is no difference between invention and dancing. Leaving aside the most intolerable part of the character design, the ballet dance is still beautiful, and the final dance scene is also pulled, so that the whole film will not fall, and the heroine's answer is also moving. There is a real connection between the Lord and her dreams. Even if she can't be on the stage, she still loves it. This is her persistence in dancing. It's not about clamoring to realize her dream, but I don't know what the dream has to do with my life. The other characters, Victor and the short, fat and white assistant are still very cute. The pair of teacher and housekeeper has been around for a long time, but unfortunately there is not much to describe.
View more about Leap! reviews
