Or is it more important to ensure that no more people are implicated? ” This is the last question from Lorera, the only incarnation of justice in the whole play. In fact, it is a question of human nature. In Game of Thrones, in front of the ugliness of human nature, whether to stand up and insist on being yourself or be wise and protect your life is a joy to face the oppression and life of your superiors. She still firmly chooses the former, perhaps for the police father who killed himself or just for the light in her heart "Maybe you just hid them" Ending Matteo's recollection of the truth about the prison uses blood facts In addition to the successive accidents and the endless public opinion framed by the masses who do not know the truth, all these pressures from the society are enough to gradually degenerate the heart of an innocent person. I think this is also the reason for the vagueness in the middle of the inocente. The border between innocence and sin is not clear because human nature is complex and cannot be judged simply by good or bad
I have to say that the name of Innocence is too clever. Mateo is innocent. He is the scapegoat of the whole play. Emma and Candace who abandoned Kimi are innocent. They just want to escape from hell. Sin was blinded by the hatred of betrayal and her dark life. Jimmy was innocent. The loss of his son took away the last bit of sanity as an intellectual. Theo was innocent. Guilty The only sinner in the whole play is actually Aniwal. His greed and desire ruined himself and also caused this series of tragedies. It was this group of innocent people who were forced to use blood again and again under the coercion of fate. The damage made up for the mistakes I once made unintentionally When the gears of fate turn
no one is guilty
No one is innocent.
View more about The Innocent reviews
