"The Most Innocent" has become popular. Director Oriol Paul has been very popular in recent years. Since "Invisible Guest", no matter what he shoots, there are a lot of people to support him, and he was even sent a "reversal" by the country King" title. But reversing this kind of thing is like a car turning a corner. If it goes well, it can overtake, but if it goes bad, it will roll over. The quality of a play cannot be judged by how many turns you turn. If the turns are all stumbling and rubbing past, then it is better to have less such reversals. Closer to home, the title is my opinion, this film is not god! Of course, the reason why it is not divine is not just the fact that there are several loopholes in the plot. Picking that kind of fault is too childish, and it will fall into the dilemma of saying it for the sake of saying it badly. I don't do that kind of thing, I'll start from the root of the suspense story, you can read it if it makes sense. Where is the bad? First of all, the most important thing about suspense is the "circle" of the story. The plot must echo the content and interlock with each other. Therefore, the beginning of the story is extremely critical, especially in film and television works. "The Chekov Gun"! The opening chapter of "The Best of Innocence" is a bar fight, which leads to the manslaughter incident of the male protagonist and the victim's parents. But as the plot progressed, we found that neither the men and women who caused the fight nor the male protagonist's brother played a role in the subsequent plots? Even the fact that the male protagonist was imprisoned became a background event, a profile of the character, and the female protagonist, the key character of the whole story, only appeared in about 7.5 minutes, and the female protagonist was the main character in the play. The key figure in the "Stripper Prostitution Candid Shooting and Blackmailing Case". But you will find that the connection between the female protagonist and the male protagonist is this almost coincidental encounter, and there is no inevitability. And the male protagonist himself did not participate in the case involving the female protagonist. This is the biggest problem of this film. At the beginning of the prime time, the male protagonist is profiled, but the male protagonist does not participate in the cases that account for most of the plot. What is the meaning of his existence? Disturb the view! Yes, all subsequent suspense and misunderstandings in the story are caused by the conflict between the male protagonist and the parents of the boy who was mistakenly killed by him. The father of the deceased was brooding about the male protagonist, and it happened that the male protagonist was involved in a complicated case, so he interfered with it and tried his best to frame it... This is the main logic of the film, isn't it very far-fetched? This far-fetched is not the result of a few plot holes, but a structural fragility! As mentioned earlier, the relationship between the male protagonist and the female protagonist is completely an accidental coincidence, which is like using a few nails in a building to fix the piers of a viaduct. Extremely unstable! How can such a fragile pier endure a solid plot? Secondly, in order to achieve a sense of suspense, in order to fully disturb the audience's sight. The victim's father exhausted all means, Most are very tedious and indirect. Feeling like a fire escape ladder to change a light bulb? Since your purpose is to kill the male protagonist, and you are not afraid of death, then the easiest way is to use the relatively harmonious relationship between your wife and the male protagonist to kill the male protagonist, and everything is done! This is the logical behavior of the characters! And the various acquisitions in the film make things extremely complicated. Seemingly interlocking is actually to disturb the audience's sight. Isn't this suspense for suspense's sake? What's more, there are many loopholes in the plot in this process, such as going to prison to bribe the prisoner to frame the male protagonist. How could the police have missed such a crucial clue after repeatedly investigating the prison situation in the story? Such a variety is exhausting. But picking faults has never been my purpose. My purpose is to hone my storytelling ability, so how to change is the key. How would I change it? The following high energy, all rights reserved, please indicate the reference. If I come to modify the script of this film. The bar fight at the beginning will be set in the strip club where the heroine is located, and the woman who caused the fight is one of the strippers. And the male protagonist accidentally killed the owner of the bar! The parents of the victim, the male protagonist's brother and sister-in-law, as well as the men and women who caused the fight, have all been deleted! This is the first step, streamlining! Don't rely on too many people to disturb the audience, that way is too low and not advanced. continue. When the male protagonist killed the boss, the female protagonist and the little sisters were about to run away. The nun dancer suspected that the male protagonist killed the boss on purpose and discovered their secret. So he took advantage of the male protagonist's parole to let his sister, the female protagonist, hook up with the male protagonist! Look, is this connection inevitable? Is it smooth? continue. But I never imagined that the female protagonist was actually doing a fake show and really fell in love with the male protagonist! Later, he told everything about it, but the male protagonist immediately said that he had not taken any keys, and it was really a manslaughter at that time! At the same time, the former guest, the senior police officer, is investigating and is also targeting the male protagonist. The male protagonist is also constantly framed by others, and he can only go to the end of the world. But the female protagonist completely believed the male protagonist and cooperated with the just policewoman to track down the truth. And quickly found the mushroom head sister at the time, who was the one who did not escape and was taken away by the police in the story. At this time, the plot can follow the original script, and soon it is discovered that she is the mastermind behind the scenes! Because she was jealous of her sister's later happiness, she framed her and the male protagonist in various ways. Then Gao police arrived, killed the little sister and took away the video that was taken secretly. On the way, he was stopped by the police who revealed the truth and eventually committed suicide. But the police found that there was one box missing from the videotape, and the missing one was the videotape of the 27th guest pinching fingers. Because the police (audience) tacitly agreed that Gao police is a kneader The client pointed to him, so he thought he had destroyed the videotape, and declared the case closed. The male protagonist is reunited with the female protagonist, and finally reunites with the female protagonist. Everything seems to be happy. The justice policewoman was ready to close the case with joy, but suddenly discovered that Police Gao had bribed a criminal before his death, and the criminal fell to his death in prison? She went to the prison to investigate again and found that the prisoner had conflicted with the male protagonist before his death, and the male protagonist was even suspected of murder? And why would he do this? The story goes back to the male protagonist, and the female protagonist tells him about her nightmare with peace of mind, how the perverted guest who pinched his fingers tortured and killed his sister. The male protagonist comforted her that everything was over, and then went to draw the curtains, but he pinched his fingers at the picture! This is the most shocking reversal! The whole story is about exaggerating the fact that the guest pinching his fingers is a pervert, and he naturally leads the suspect to Gao Police. When he died, the audience breathed a sigh of relief. But who says only one guest can pinch fingers? Therefore, the video tapes that Gao Police got were missing from the beginning, and the most crucial box was taken away by the male protagonist long ago, because he was the guest No. 27! The story starts from the beginning. The male protagonist goes to the bar to get his videotape, but it turns out that the nun dancer started first and has already taken all the videotapes. He didn't have time to chase and was discovered by the boss, and by mistake he became a suspect. So in order to escape, he deliberately created chaos in the bar, but in the chaos he accidentally killed the boss! The boss dies and the tape disappears. The male protagonist became the biggest suspect, so Police Gao hired someone to press him, but he was killed by the protagonist, who in turn pressed Gao Police behind the scenes. Soon after, the male protagonist was released on parole, and when he met the female protagonist, he knew her purpose. So he turned against the guest and used the heroine to find the nun dancer, kill her and get the videotape. But in order to frame the blame for the high-level police, he took the bait and kept tempting the other party to take the bait, and finally made the other party a scapegoat. Wouldn't the story be much more exciting and reasonable? Of course, many original parties may disagree, and they will cite a lot of reasons, such as character shaping; human contradictions; character relationships... But I still have to say that no matter how good the character's humanity is, it is like a float. , but if these cars are driving on a bridge with unstable piers, wouldn't it be bullshit? The key to a good or bad suspense story lies in the harmony and unity of logic and expression. Deviating from this principle to talk about human nature is purely a matter of cutting a boat and seeking a sword! So let alone God, this work is at most a passing suspense film, and it will not exceed 7 points at most (10 points). Ever bribed a criminal before who fell to his death in prison? She went to the prison to investigate again and found that the prisoner had conflicted with the male protagonist before his death, and the male protagonist was even suspected of murder? And why would he do this? The story goes back to the male protagonist, and the female protagonist tells him about her nightmare with peace of mind, how the perverted guest who pinched his fingers tortured and killed his sister. The male protagonist comforted her that everything was over, and then went to draw the curtains, but he pinched his fingers at the picture! This is the most shocking reversal! The whole story is about exaggerating the fact that the guest pinching his fingers is a pervert, and he naturally leads the suspect to Gao Police. When he died, the audience breathed a sigh of relief. But who says only one guest can pinch fingers? Therefore, the video tapes that Gao Police got were missing from the beginning, and the most crucial box was taken away by the male protagonist long ago, because he was the guest No. 27! The story starts from the beginning. The male protagonist goes to the bar to get his videotape, but it turns out that the nun dancer started first and has already taken all the videotapes. He didn't have time to chase and was discovered by the boss, and by mistake he became a suspect. So in order to escape, he deliberately created chaos in the bar, but in the chaos he accidentally killed the boss! The boss dies and the tape disappears. The male protagonist became the biggest suspect, so Police Gao hired someone to press him, but he was killed by the protagonist, who in turn pressed Gao Police behind the scenes. Soon after, the male protagonist was released on parole, and when he met the female protagonist, he knew her purpose. So he turned against the guest and used the heroine to find the nun dancer, kill her and get the videotape. But in order to frame the blame for the high-level police, he took the bait and kept tempting the other party to take the bait, and finally made the other party a scapegoat. Wouldn't the story be much more exciting and reasonable? Of course, many original parties may disagree, and they will cite a lot of reasons, such as character shaping; human contradictions; character relationships... But I still have to say that no matter how good the character's humanity is, it is like a float. , but if these cars are driving on a bridge with unstable piers, wouldn't it be bullshit? The key to a good or bad suspense story lies in the harmony and unity of logic and expression. Deviating from this principle to talk about human nature is purely a matter of cutting a boat and seeking a sword! So let alone God, this work is at most a passing suspense film, and it will not exceed 7 points at most (10 points). Ever bribed a criminal before who fell to his death in prison? She went to the prison to investigate again and found that the prisoner had conflicted with the male protagonist before his death, and the male protagonist was even suspected of murder? And why would he do this? The story goes back to the male protagonist, and the female protagonist tells him about her nightmare with peace of mind, how the perverted guest who pinched his fingers tortured and killed his sister. The male protagonist comforted her that everything was over, and then went to draw the curtains, but he pinched his fingers at the picture! This is the most shocking reversal! The whole story is about exaggerating the fact that the guest pinching his fingers is a pervert, and he naturally leads the suspect to Gao Police. When he died, the audience breathed a sigh of relief. But who says only one guest can pinch fingers? Therefore, the video tapes that Gao Police got were missing from the beginning, and the most crucial box was taken away by the male protagonist long ago, because he was the guest No. 27! The story starts from the beginning. The male protagonist goes to the bar to get his videotape, but it turns out that the nun dancer started first and has already taken all the videotapes. He didn't have time to chase and was discovered by the boss, and by mistake he became a suspect. So in order to escape, he deliberately created chaos in the bar, but in the chaos he accidentally killed the boss! The boss dies and the tape disappears. The male protagonist became the biggest suspect, so Police Gao hired someone to press him, but he was killed by the protagonist, who in turn pressed Gao Police behind the scenes. Soon after, the male protagonist was released on parole, and when he met the female protagonist, he knew her purpose. So he turned against the guest and used the heroine to find the nun dancer, kill her and get the videotape. But in order to frame the blame for the high-level police, he took the bait and kept tempting the other party to take the bait, and finally made the other party a scapegoat. Wouldn't the story be much more exciting and reasonable? Of course, many original parties may disagree, and they will cite a lot of reasons, such as character shaping; human contradictions; character relationships... But I still have to say that no matter how good the character's humanity is, it is like a float. , but if these cars are driving on a bridge with unstable piers, wouldn't it be bullshit? The key to a good or bad suspense story lies in the harmony and unity of logic and expression. Deviating from this principle to talk about human nature is purely a matter of cutting a boat and seeking a sword! So let alone God, this work is at most a passing suspense film, and it will not exceed 7 points at most (10 points). It is the most shocking reversal! The whole story is about exaggerating the fact that the guest pinching his fingers is a pervert, and he naturally leads the suspect to Gao Police. When he died, the audience breathed a sigh of relief. But who says only one guest can pinch fingers? Therefore, the video tapes that Gao Police got were missing from the beginning, and the most crucial box was taken away by the male protagonist long ago, because he was the guest No. 27! The story starts from the beginning. The male protagonist goes to the bar to get his videotape, but it turns out that the nun dancer started first and has already taken all the videotapes. He didn't have time to chase and was discovered by the boss, and by mistake he became a suspect. So in order to escape, he deliberately created chaos in the bar, but in the chaos he accidentally killed the boss! The boss dies and the tape disappears. The male protagonist became the biggest suspect, so Police Gao hired someone to press him, but he was killed by the protagonist, who in turn pressed Gao Police behind the scenes. Soon after, the male protagonist was released on parole, and when he met the female protagonist, he knew her purpose. So he turned against the guest and used the heroine to find the nun dancer, kill her and get the videotape. But in order to frame the blame for the high-level police, he took the bait and kept tempting the other party to take the bait, and finally made the other party a scapegoat. Wouldn't the story be much more exciting and reasonable? Of course, many original parties may disagree, and they will cite a lot of reasons, such as character shaping; human contradictions; character relationships... But I still have to say that no matter how good the character's humanity is, it is like a float. , but if these cars are driving on a bridge with unstable piers, wouldn't it be bullshit? The key to a good or bad suspense story lies in the harmony and unity of logic and expression. Deviating from this principle to talk about human nature is purely a matter of cutting a boat and seeking a sword! So let alone God, this work is at most a passing suspense film, and it will not exceed 7 points at most (10 points). It is the most shocking reversal! The whole story is about exaggerating the fact that the guest pinching his fingers is a pervert, and he naturally leads the suspect to Gao Police. When he died, the audience breathed a sigh of relief. But who says only one guest can pinch fingers? Therefore, the video tapes that Gao Police got were missing from the beginning, and the most crucial box was taken away by the male protagonist long ago, because he was the guest No. 27! The story starts from the beginning. The male protagonist goes to the bar to get his videotape, but it turns out that the nun dancer started first and has already taken all the videotapes. He didn't have time to chase and was discovered by the boss, and by mistake he became a suspect. So in order to escape, he deliberately created chaos in the bar, but in the chaos he accidentally killed the boss! The boss dies and the tape disappears. The male protagonist became the biggest suspect, so Police Gao hired someone to press him, but he was killed by the protagonist, who in turn pressed Gao Police behind the scenes. Soon after, the male protagonist was released on parole, and when he met the female protagonist, he knew her purpose. So he turned against the guest and used the heroine to find the nun dancer, kill her and get the videotape. But in order to frame the blame for the high-level police, he took the bait and kept tempting the other party to take the bait, and finally made the other party a scapegoat. Wouldn't the story be much more exciting and reasonable? Of course, many original parties may disagree, and they will cite a lot of reasons, such as character shaping; human contradictions; character relationships... But I still have to say that no matter how good the character's humanity is, it is like a float. , but if these cars are driving on a bridge with unstable piers, wouldn't it be bullshit? The key to a good or bad suspense story lies in the harmony and unity of logic and expression. Deviating from this principle to talk about human nature is purely a matter of cutting a boat and seeking a sword! So let alone God, this work is at most a passing suspense film, and it will not exceed 7 points at most (10 points). The dancer killed her and got the tape. But in order to frame the blame for the high-level police, he took the bait and kept tempting the other party to take the bait, and finally made the other party a scapegoat. Wouldn't the story be much more exciting and reasonable? Of course, many original parties may disagree, and they will cite a lot of reasons, such as character shaping; human contradictions; character relationships... But I still have to say that no matter how good the character's humanity is, it is like a float. , but if these cars are driving on a bridge with unstable piers, wouldn't it be bullshit? The key to a good or bad suspense story lies in the harmony and unity of logic and expression. Deviating from this principle to talk about human nature is purely a matter of cutting a boat and seeking a sword! So let alone God, this work is at most a passing suspense film, and it will not exceed 7 points at most (10 points). The dancer killed her and got the tape. But in order to frame the blame for the high-level police, he took the bait and kept tempting the other party to take the bait, and finally made the other party a scapegoat. Wouldn't the story be much more exciting and reasonable? Of course, many original parties may disagree, and they will cite a lot of reasons, such as character shaping; human contradictions; character relationships... But I still have to say that no matter how good the character's humanity is, it is like a float. , but if these cars are driving on a bridge with unstable piers, wouldn't it be bullshit? The key to a good or bad suspense story lies in the harmony and unity of logic and expression. Deviating from this principle to talk about human nature is purely a matter of cutting a boat and seeking a sword! So let alone God, this work is at most a passing suspense film, and it will not exceed 7 points at most (10 points).
View more about The Innocent reviews
