Obscure! Very obscure! Super obscure!

Letha 2022-04-20 09:02:16

The whole play actually revolves around the focus of ------ choice! The choice of all 1. The choice of
ten survivors ' occupation The 3 trials we did actually show that to get the right choice, you must try many times (of course, there is no such chance in the cruel reality) This is a matter of probability, and infinite attempts will always be correct once (in fact, it is only the majority of People agree, there is no complete correctness) and it also implicitly proves that it is the most effective way to try to hit the correct probability ! -Trolley inference (choice) The same inference will also be expounded in the next film. Choice must have sacrifices, then who will be sacrificed? Whether it is the fat man ( poet ) or those five people (other professions), no one should be chosen, all sacrifices should be based on voluntary (of course it is undeniable that people are selfish and no one is willing to sacrifice) 6 on the rails The individual was bound, and the fat man didn't take the initiative to hit the train. The switchman (in fact, he implied the role of the teacher) was in control of everything. But he was always an executioner (later films revealed why he cheated) - Ignorance is a blessing paradox (trust) Obviously this paradox is reflected in the third thought experiment, everyone fully trusts the heroine's choice without questioning support , a self- sacrificing choice. Out of the coercion (teacher, mysterious person), 20 people have sublimated their thinking patterns! The above 3 items are similar to the reclamation---construction---belief details in the construction game began for the first time








































Assuming a nuclear explosion environment, because of the number of people in the shelter, half of the people must be discarded.
At this time, first of all, everyone used a very narrow and primitive way to
choose the most needed occupation. All kinds of arguments are just to survive,
but there is still one mysterious person. Man (teacher) he is actually playing the role of a regime
In this primitive way the importance of regime is only questioned by the heroine
but the gun (right) makes her compromise! Let everyone compromise!
The shooting before entering the sanctuary (a foolish approach) embodies the raw atrocities and single-mindedness of the original regime that
eventually led to the overthrow of the regime (separated from the sanctuary) Thinking
it was over? Abandon the mysterious people, they are missing an important thing "password" (leadership)
This thought experiment ended in failure!


It 's the second
time. This time, each profession has additional attributes, which are good or bad. It
seems that there is no problem with the choice of professions (seems to solve the problem of food and clothing), and
start matching to choose who has sex with whom and has feelings for? Pure fertility? (Each role sets class status),
but did not get pregnant for a long time (the regulations are not perfect)
, then began to increase the number of times and mix and match (reform) but was opposed (from left and right)
bloody melee teacher was injured (contradictions in the reform, there must be someone Injured)
Apparently the injury of the mysterious man (teacher) shows that the regime has been shaken again. The
mysterious man opens the door to all sacrifices (regime violent repression) There is no people, no state The


episode
is interspersed with an interesting story before the start of the third experiment.
Plato's cave It is a fable
that all a child sees before breaking free from shackles are shadows and echoes. After breaking free from shackles, he realizes that the new world
implies the teacher's arrogance, narrow-mindedness, and refusal to accept new ideas.


the third time
Well, the last experiment began. This time, I chose some occupations that were not understood by people, and the purpose of independent choice after trust was not to survive, but to live. The exiled mysterious man appeared again, and his revenge was shocked by silence.


Summarize the next 3 experiments
The first time: feudal autocracy
The second time: capitalism
The third time: communism


These are not the most important points: the most important point is how to choose

the recognized choice:
aside from the subjective thinking
and repeating predictions
, the least likely Sacrificial
Communication


As if I forgot to mention that hero-heroine romance. . .
This is just a gimmick in my opinion. For the sake of the box office, it
is a sweeter way of summarizing the concept of the whole show!

View more about After the Dark reviews

Extended Reading
  • Genesis 2022-03-19 09:01:07

    Named but not real. Just put forward a few philosophical examples are experts? Philosophy is to make people think, not to provide established answers. The logic of this film is unqualified, but there is still a little creativity... If you are interested in understanding the big world of philosophy, it would be better to read a few more books.

  • Wayne 2022-03-15 09:01:06

    No philosophy at all Wittgenstein and Plato must cry to death

After the Dark quotes

  • Utami: [singing] Lenten ys come with love to toune / with blosmen ant with briddes roune / that al this blisse bryngeth;/ Dayes-eyes in this dales / notes suete of nyhtegales / uch foul song singeth./ The threstelcoc him threteth oo / away is huere wynter wo / when woderove springeth;/ This foules singeth ferly fele / ant wlyteth on huere wynne wele / that al the wode ryngeth.

  • [Mr. Zimit just announced to the class that they'll conduct a final big thought experiment, about survival during a global cataclysm]

    Chips: But what kind of cataclysm are we talking about? Gamma ray burst? Pandemic? Erupting super volcano? A sudden shift in the Earth's axis rotation? Grey goo?

    Mr. Zimit: Hang on, Chips, we'll get there.

    Chips: But is it biological? Geological? Thermo-nuclear? Meteorological?

    Mr. Zimit: Let's go old school. Say... atomic.