After watching the movie, I feel that the great Hugo's narrative at the end of this movie is really a stinky fart. From the movie, the black child who broke the law in the first place doesn't care about killing people, and can only be said to be a scum who should be shot. The black aunts and they should pay this responsibility. The police is to eliminate the wicked, whether it is a child or an adult. Secondly, Stephen is an incompetent anti-special force person, a waste policeman who goes through the back door. In reality, it is impossible to get that card, this Shit is only worthy of being an unqualified clerk. In reality, he is a scum who has lost face in the police world. Secondly, black people who commit crimes should be eradicated, including children. No wonder what happened in the United States. Judging from this film, black people should be eliminated. They cause social unrest enough to destroy themselves, so they must die for the stability of the majority. Finally, I would like to emphasize one point. To say that peasants are bad can only mean that their families did not educate good children. The police are social education. The last words here are no longer suitable for narration in movies. , because they can even destroy their own mayor, and have lost the hope of human existence, so destructive education should exist and work to the greatest extent, evil deterrence is the most effective, the director is still on sociology, I don't understand educational psychology, the film is well done but the intention is completely wrong
View more about Les Misérables reviews
