I don't know who used it first, at least for "1942", there are too many "sincere" and "sincere" evaluations. Now, for movies that can't find any obvious advantages, they have to be idealistic, "there is no credit, there is hard work", there is no hard work, and there is an unpredictable heart that people can capture. Countless people followed suit, and "sincerity works" flew all over the sky. This, first of all, shows that the evaluators' "copycat" thinking, like the stars they evaluate, only repeats others and repeats themselves.
Jackie Chan is really repeating himself.
The story of "The Zodiac" seems familiar, but it continues. Because the film has just been released, I will take care of Uncle Jackie Chan's mood and will not make a detailed analysis for the time being. All we can say is that the story is real... at best it can only be considered "sincere".
The action scenes expected by the audience not only lack any innovation and surprise, but also contain too much falsehood and clumsiness. With the regret of not having enough drama addiction, we can only say... Jackie Chan's efforts are still very "sincere".
Jackie Chan, who is nearly 60 years old, plays with actresses of his granddaughter generation, creating a very incongruous feeling for the audience. Alas, it can only be said that it is still very "sincere".
Is it "sincerely" or "intentionally"? ——It can be said that Jackie Chan is "sincerely" to help us celebrate the New Year; it can also be said that Jackie Chan is "chengxin" to overdraw his fame, and "chengxin" uses 101 to take money from our pockets.
Dear viewers, beware of "sincere" propaganda, which may be just euphemisms for "low quality" and "mediocre".
View more about Chinese Zodiac reviews
