The "comedy" that made me lose so much

Libbie 2022-04-21 09:03:03

I don't see where the comedy is at all. Not funny and disgusting at all. Speechless values ​​and views on love, the screenwriter's imagination is very strong, but the mind is simple and completely nonsense.
The pacing of the movie is very problematic at the beginning. After looking at it for half an hour, I didn't see half a fly. Then I paid a little attention to the duration and found that it was as long as 2 hours. Well, anyway, I was bored watching it when I was in the car, so just wait and don't press fast forward.
The predecessor of the fly is the second male, a poor diaosi, who insists on using all kinds of little tricks that don't cost money to please the heroine. In fact, in the movie, when the power went out that night, he used the TV antenna on the rooftop to add tin foil to reflect the moonlight to provide light to the hostess' house on the rooftop. Coquettish, winking in the eyes of the heroine all the time, with a smile that seems to be unwashed under that wretched beard, he is simply the setting of a despicable man in AV. I always thought it was impossible for the heroine to be interested in him at all. But I didn't expect that the heroine actually showed signs of being moved.
After the second male was killed by the jealous male third (the bad guy), he possessed and entered the male one - a fly that could not speak but had a human mind (he was an egg at that time). Then cooperate with the heroine to plan revenge.
Take it too seriously and I lose—yes, I lose a hell of a lot.
In fact, I'm still looking forward to it. What kind of story would it be if the flies had been attached to the soul of vengeance? So I'm not serious about this. Expectation value plus 20 points (if you are serious, deduct 100 points directly here)
First, I lost to the reason why the heroine and the second man fell in love. The coquettishness of the second man and the tricks of chasing girls made me lose my appetite. Here I lost 50 points.
Second, the female protagonist supports the male protagonist's revenge action, and supports it so thoroughly that she even continues to fall in love with flies. I lost to their various cooperation showing affection, and lost 20 points here.
Third, the male number three could not find a way to defeat the flies. You said that it was a very special fly - in fact, the third male is a relatively normal character in my eyes. He is a hateful villain. The only thing is that in the duel with the fly, the IQ is directly unconditionally lowered by the screenwriter. To a negative number - I can't help but say something for him: You idiot, screenwriter! Why can't even the insecticide spray kill it? Why can't I afford an electric mosquito swatter? Why didn't I extinguish the small fire after the wizard cast the spell, but kept knocking on the glass and calling for help? Why should I blow up my home with a cannon? Here I lost 50 points.
Fourth, the film's values. Murder is unreasonable. But in this film, the righteous people take the process of killing and torturing people as a kind of fun, and the film also takes this point to the greatest extent. I am very unhappy with the state of complacent after killing people. Here I lost 20 points.
The above, it may be very interesting to play in other movies. For example, if you let Zhou Xingchi flirt in "Tang Bohu's Autumn Fragrance", I will feel good; you let Shawn Yue kiss Miriam Yeung, I think it is reasonable; you let the white-headed detective The opponent is a serious idiot, which I find interesting. But combined on this bizarre movie, it really makes me a little bit uncomfortable, lose another 10 points. So -
cumulatively, I lost: 20-50-20-50-20-10=-130 points (out of 100) I
lost completely and completely.
Don't spray if you don't like it.

View more about Eega reviews

Extended Reading

Eega quotes

  • Nani: Bindu Joliki raavaddu... Champaista!