Thinking about the copy at the beginning of the film (I think the positioning here is not a shoddy copy, but a copy that tries to restore it.) The discussion on the value of the film, the director's intention may be to use the hero and heroine as an example to trigger Viewer's thoughts. But the rambles and street walks similar to the sunset make people feel that the director lacks new ideas.
When it comes to the reason for the existence of copies, I think it is scarcity. First, it exists because there is a need. Whether it can replace the effect of the original object after it exists depends on the attitude of the recipient of the art towards the copy. If the needs of the art recipients themselves are purely intuitive copies of feelings, then for them, authenticity is not the most important thing.
Generally speaking, the perception of the art recipient about the work is more about the story behind the source work, which adds a layer of mystery to the work and stimulates the recipient's curiosity. To a certain extent, the genuine product is only the art recipient. In the end, it adds color to the process of art seeking, but it also gives a kind of psychological satisfaction to the vain art recipient, "Ah, what I see is the real thing."
If it can bring enjoyment and pleasure to the recipient of the art and cause thinking, then I think it is not wrong to let the copy replace the real one. It’s just that some art recipients will still compare the real and fake art psychologically, because they focus on seeing the real product rather than how much the work brings to him. I dare to say that there is no relevant artistic background or Knowledge, art recipients’ views on works of art mostly fall on the story behind the color of the picture, rather than on the level of artistic technical usage. In this way, the secondary product can actually bring the same effect, and the audience who depends on the real product. It seems that they have already made a round-about judgment before appreciating, that only the genuine product can make their art appreciation a level higher, and the secondary product is just some shoddy copying, and it is also an act that violates the rights and interests of the original author.
I do not deny that the copy is because the copy has its own meaning and cannot be killed with a single stick, but it does not mean that allowing the existence of the copy recognizes that the copy has a higher value than the original work, because in different situations, each item can play a role Different values, you can't compare and consider and come to a conclusion, and the reason why we still think that the original work is more valuable than the copy is because there is no specific example of the copy to prove to others that it is indeed possible at some point. Playing a higher value than the original, but failing to prove it doesn't mean it doesn't have that. So in my opinion, the value comparison that stays in the real and fake is not the most important, but how much thinking they can bring people.
Apart from the discussion on the simple copy, this film uses James as a copy, and she plays a middle-aged couple as an example. This copy is a setting that changes from an emotionless thing to a person with emotion, and this is inevitably more moral consideration above. In my opinion, in humans, the need for a copy is not as long as it has the same memory and the same length and the same language, but to act as a perfect copy of the real thing, otherwise this copy has no actual meaning, like if James can't comfort or Understand her, then the meaning of the existence of the copy is only like something tied to the heroine, and all you can see is the endless quarrel. Let me understand, everyone is irreplaceable, and I don't agree with the copy used on people.
I didn't like this film very much, but it made me write a film review in a maddening manner. If the director's purpose is to make people think, then he has achieved it. Juliette Binoche finally won the Best Actress at the Cannes International Film Festival, which also puzzled me. Maybe I didn't like the character setting of the manic middle-aged woman from the beginning. The beginning of a less friendly conversation, and in the process, I tried to persuade the other party, but I could only persuade the other party by raising the volume or asking others to help, but the more I tried to prove something, the less I could prove it. Women always seem to fill this role, and men tend to be stubborn too. I think each of them should play a good role. In fact, the old man inside said that if you put your hand on her shoulder, everything will be fine. Or stop persuading or change the other person's mind.
Attached is the more exciting dialogue in the movie:
"I really want to tell them not to be too superstitious about marriage, and don't be too attached to commitment. Only love and awareness can maintain marriage."
"What is awareness?"
"Change, everything will change, and commitment also You can't stop it. You can't ask a tree to promise that the flowers won't wither at the end of the spring. Because the flowers wilt to bear fruit, and then the fruit falls from the tree."
"And then?"
"A garden without leaves."
"None . A garden of leaves?"
"A Polish poem. A garden without leaves, dare to say it is not beautiful."
View more about Certified Copy reviews
