inclusive love

August 2022-09-06 07:24:18

In the ninth commandment, Lomac is the husband who is defined by the doctor as an impotent husband, Hanja is the wife who is defined by the world as a thief, Lomac is going to divorce Hanja, Hanja said, "The love of husband and wife is not between the legs. , but in my heart." But Romack still doubted because of fear. Their marriage was surviving through weak and struggling cracks. They both loved each other, but they each had their own difficulties. Lomike tells Anka to make friends with other men, but his heart is full of jealousy and suspicion; although Hanjia loves Lomike deeply, he can't suppress his desire for sex, and begins an unscrupulous love affair with a college boy. One day, Lomac heard his wife's voice getting nervous, and began to monitor her phone, and found that she was secretly dating a young Spurr. Lomac stalked Hanga, listening painfully to the sounds of their sex. Later, he even hid in the closet for a peek, and that day Han Jia proposed to break up with Spurr and stop cheating on her husband. After Spurr left, Han Jia accidentally found her husband's eyes in the dark and left in anger. In desperation, Lomac decided to commit suicide.
"Love is not a five-minute moaning in bed every week. Love is rooted in the heart, not between the legs." A couple who will face a major trial in their marriage as they hug each other in bed, the wife tells her husband the above words. She said she wanted to be with him all her life. That's a dialogue from an elite police officer in the "Ninth Commandment".
In the ninth commandment, Kieslowski would probably ask: Is there any pure love in the world? How far can the tolerance of love extend? Is love always pure and simple, or is there always something missing? In the story, Hanga said to Lomike: "What matters is what we have, not what we don't have." In the real world, can it really be practiced like this? If "spirit" and "desire" can be considered as binary separation, why is the trust between lovers so fragile and vulnerable? This is a myth and question that is deeply rooted in everyone's heart.
In Kieslowski's biography, there is a story about the "Ten Commandments": one day, on the streets of Berlin, a fifty-year-old lady recognized him, took his hand and cried It turned out that although she and her daughter lived together, they were strangers for five or six years. Later, the mother and daughter watched the TV series "The Ten Commandments" together. After watching it, the daughter suddenly kissed her mother. This story, Kieslowski said: "Just for this kiss, for this woman, making that movie is worth it." Not for fame and fortune, but this is what Kieslowski cherishes. Of, he said: "I don't shoot metaphors. Metaphors are for people to read. It's good stuff. I always try to stir people up and make them want to do something, whether it's pulling them into a story, Or give them inspiration to analyze the story. What matters is that I can force them to do something, or move them in a particular way. That's what I do: to get people to experience something, no matter what. It doesn't matter if you experience it intellectually or emotionally. You make a movie to give people something, to take them to another place, whether that world is intuitive or intellectual, that's fine." Chieslow Kieslowski's belief in making movies is also one of the reasons why I adore Kieslowski.

View more about Dekalog reviews