I totally agree with DISC theory. But I think it's about power. Open sex is about power; sm is about power; gender status, reproductive worship, it's all about power, because sex is about power. So I think it's really wrong to make wonder woman a cartoon for children to read, because it's an experiment in how to control. The Sappho episode is very interesting, the spark between the two heroines is really visible, and it's fake if you don't want to be on it.
The open relationship of three people is based on mutual love and the pursuit of human nature, but what is the reason for this long-lasting love, the balance of power? Is submitter eternal? Wouldn't it be over if the submitter pursued dominance one day? How does Rebecca's character as a tough controller deal with emotions he can't control? She needs to constantly draw strength from being in control and being subjugated, both husband and olive are submissive to her in different ways and break down once she feels overpowered. Although in the end she also learned to surrender. But I feel that the surrendered are too easily destroyed. As long as the surrenderer no longer accepts it voluntarily, and no longer chooses to surrender, he is defeated.
This story is beyond my imagination. The editing, photography, and script are all great. The best thing is the acting of the lead actor. I surrender.
View more about Professor Marston & the Wonder Women reviews
