From a plot point of view, there's not much to say about this movie. For the director's attempt to rationalize something that is actually quite perverted and niche, and to logicalize every emotional change of the three protagonists Marston, Elizabeth and Oliver, and storytelling their perverted lives, I Always feel uncomfortable. BDSM is a kind of perverted behavior, right? Why to explain why it happened and evolved, just let him exist! Not everything exists for a reason, and not everything needs to be explained by supporting knowledge! Some things are not very beautiful but do not affect others very much, just let them exist! Never glorify perverted behavior in order to flaunt liberalism. This is my general view on such movies: love is unique to everyone, and when others try to deny, change or even insult it, it is very touching and has the power to fight against all odds and try your best to maintain it. Impressive beauty. But never sell this love to others. The following are some of the points of concern in the film to talk about experience.
1. About the sex shop: It is possible to fall in love with two or more people at the same time, and if there are no moral and ideological constraints, this possibility is still very high, but the movie attributes the enlightenment of discovering SM hobbies to a random incident. The results of shopping at the small shops on the street are somewhat ridiculous. Is that because people like SM themselves? Or did you find yourself in love with SM after seeing colorful sex toys? Or, no one in the world naturally likes SM, just because of the marketing strategies and methods of the sex toy store, so that your innate dislike to be guided and educated to like it (at least you think you like it)? I'm leaning towards the third, the movie says it's the first. SM is a kind of nature of some people. Some people "really want it". Whether it is a sex shop, a rope, or a live demonstration, it is all to develop the unknown "love" you already exist. come out and become known.
2. About DISC theory. It is right for the movie to deliberately downplay it, because using theory to explain abnormal behavior is the least powerful way to explain it. It is better to explain abnormal behavior as accidental events such as being struck by lightning.
3. Discovery of new media. The comic book "Wonder Woman" is a new propaganda medium about freedom and feminism in that era. Pictures are always more contagious than words, and they spread faster.
4. Happy individuals and happy societies? Finally, Marston asked Oliver, who had opened up a new life: Are you happy? Oliver was speechless. I believe that Oliver is unhappy, but so what, in the society, who is really happy? It is better to see what others do, and then do what I want, to pursue a moderate level of happiness for individuals in a happy society. Your own love is as strong as it can be, but once it's back in society? Want to cooperate with others? What about your relatives and friends? If everyone only cares about their own happiness, if everyone thinks that love is enough, if there is no one who can't live without it? The world is still scary.
PS: If in the future, people can really only do what they want to do and what they want, and all the things they don’t want to do or want but have to cooperate with others are all thrown to artificial intelligence, what will the world look like? Woolen cloth? Everyone is a world, and the relationship between people is as far as the relationship between the planet and the planet before it? Hard to imagine.
View more about Professor Marston & the Wonder Women reviews
