After watching a movie, I thought I was watching a cartoon;
After reading the film review, I realized that I was looking at history;
Whether or not it is a metaphor for history, the animation's visual sense is beautiful. In addition, even people who don't know the history can understand what the director wants to express. From a big point, I think the core of the movie is "naturalization and naturalization". free".
What the protector needs is obedience and naturalization, and needs people to obey (including the mother who intends to tame Miba); the wolf walkers (and the wolf) do not want to be bound by the city, they can be free in the forest.
When the new order and the old order collide, there must be a contradiction between "naturalization and freedom", and "how to seek common ground while reserving differences" is a task left by time. And the movie gave an answer: the departure of one party.
The departure of one party only seems good, because it alleviates the short-term conflict, which will still arise unless resources are sufficient.
Which answer is the best, and whether there is the best solution, no one knows, but there will be bloodshed and conflict.
View more about Wolfwalkers reviews
