No, this film can still have more than seven points? ? I'm just so confused. This film gives me the feeling that it is a 9 for the painting, a 2 for the script and a barely passing 6 for the industry. I really like the style of painting. There is a kind of romance unique to Europe. Everyone is not free. Basically, the images in the city are very square, which will give people a rigid and mean feeling. , and the wolves in the forest are basically outlined with curved lines, including the background of the city, which is mainly square, while the background in the forest is mostly free and wild. reflect this theme.
But what I'm talking about is this script, this script really completely ruined such a good painting. Because he didn't know what he wanted to talk about at the end of this script. If you wanted to say that he was talking about protecting nature, he didn't dig deeply into the aspect of protecting nature. He just said a few words, "The habitat of wolves" The ground was destroyed, so the wolves had to migrate, like a background board, and the topic was never discussed again after that. At the end, the protagonist and his friends, as well as his parents, went to find a new habitat. Then why protect nature, the importance of protecting nature has not been reflected at all.
What you want to talk about is that people want to pursue freedom, but there is no real discussion in the script about what freedom is. Except for the little wolf girl, the characters here are free from the beginning, and I don't understand what the others are doing. His father was protecting his daughter from the beginning, and in the end he was also protecting his daughter. The role has not changed from beginning to end. The little wolf girl was very free at the beginning, and she was very free at the end. The role has not changed. The heroine was very egoistic at the beginning, and she followed his father to make a fool of herself. After that, she was also very egoistic, regardless of his father's obstruction, or To help Little Wolf Girl, he didn't change either. A story, the three main characters have not changed from beginning to end, so what is the main story of your story? It's definitely not about the changes and growth of characters.
But it doesn't talk about the growth of the characters, just talking about the story, there is nothing new.
Let’s start with the conflict created to advance the plot. None of these conflicts are inevitable at all. Conflict is a conflict created forcibly in order to advance the plot. The contradiction between wolves and people, wolves want habitat, in this regard, people actually have absolutely no need to conflict with them. So the story creates an Archon here. Don't kill the wolf. Obviously many people are dissatisfied with his rule, but there has been a wave of wolf-killing all over the city. I don't understand the logic. The conflict between the little girl and her father, I always thought that this conflict was for the character to grow, but the character did not grow in the end, so this conflict seemed to be a conflict for the sake of conflict.
They use a story core that looks very high to package a clichéd self-moving story to the extreme. To be honest, I think this film might get a 6 out of 10.
View more about Wolfwalkers reviews
