Just for movies.
"Class" sounds like a word that divides people. In fact, many words are, and so is education. Class can be preceded by all kinds of attributives, and it is these attributives that really trap people, because we are always looking at the height of this mountain. What's more, the mountain may laugh at the lowness of the mountain.
What does the real upper class look like? Is it not being able to dance with the kids to the music at a party? Or do I have to use advanced English when communicating? Perhaps this kind of upper-class society was designed by adults themselves to accumulate contacts and exclusion for children and for themselves.
We may also hide this kind of thinking in our interest classes when we were young. If my parents paid a lot of money for me to learn ballet piano or paid little or no money for me to learn paper cutting and diabolo, I think I might choose the former. Because no one around me learns to cut paper, no one can shake diabolo, and there are many people who learn piano, I want to fit into a large group, and want to look elegant, I would rather be an ordinary one among a bunch of phoenixes, I also don't want to be a maverick chicken. But why do I feel that learning those things is inferior? Because that's what I think now. If it was me when I was young, maybe I would choose more freely.
Most of us always unknowingly and logically think, as if we have found an organization and found a resonance, and there is no reason to break the shackles. The way of life of the poor is to survive, and the way of life of the rich is to live, to live elegantly, to strive for and enjoy rights. Raj is undoubtedly a brave man who begins to acknowledge that the rich disenfranchise the poor in order to serve themselves better, reinforcing this class status quo. There are too few people like Raj, at least in the eyes of many parents, this approach is impulsive and emotional.
Raj, like the splash of a pebble thrown into the sea, existed and then disappeared. Pia ended up going to a public school, where she could enjoy the freedom and time with friends. The minimum living condition she stepped out of school was also his father, living a rich life unless she gave up her family and property. And the poor are still largely poor.
Good educational resources can be obtained through economic means, so educational equity is also relative. The commodity society makes education a way to success rather than an end, so the so-called behavior of successful people feeding back education has become a non-essential action. The educational systems of the poor and the rich seem to be parallel, not parallel but parallel. Despite many efforts by philanthropists and public institutions to compensate and promote underdeveloped education, it is difficult to change this situation in a short period of time.
I've been wondering what the hell the slit-back dress at the beginning of the movie has to do with the movie. Maybe it's also a confrontation with the stereotype. The young girl wants to catch up with the trend and wear a skirt that was persuaded by her friends and neighbors to give up. The only one who helped her is a small tailor in a clothing store. This little tailor may also be a representative of the poor. Maybe the so-called poor people dare to make moves to break the secular and prejudice. Because they are not afraid of losing, they choose to live a happier life.
View more about Hindi Medium reviews
