1. This movie is a lively complaint about the current society.
Changing time for money, what is the difference between the future world described in the movie and the present? Except for a fluorescent bar that counts down on everyone's arm.
A few rich people concentrate a lot of wealth, and the poor live a day by day. If you don’t have money, just watch your dear one die in front of you, and if you have money, stretch your arms and pay more. The poor live in the 12th district of the poor and the rich live in the 1st district of the rich. The poor have to bargain for a "3-hour" cup of coffee, while the rich stay in a hotel suite for "2 months" for one night. The only high-tech place seems to be the device for transmitting time. The movie hasn't said how to transmit it. You can transmit as much as you want. .
2. Did the hero and heroine really save the "future" world?
There is an old saying that wealth is always in the hands of a few people. Once this seemingly unbalanced balance is broken, violent wars will follow one after another. The seductive beauty Amanda and the handsome guy Justin can't do this truth no matter how many banks are hijacked.
Population growth is also a problem. Survival of the fittest and the strong tells us that resources are limited. No matter whether you look 25 years old or not, someone who lives long will surely die sooner.
3. Rich dads are never as attractive as poor boys, even if they look the same young=3=
In addition, is there anyone who is like the original poster who has evil thoughts when he sees his wife, daughter, mother and three beautiful women standing in a row. . . =3=
Someone stretches out his arms to me after watching the movie. Give me some time..so i dont have to go to work tomorrow...= =Biao Liao Tucao is weak. .
View more about In Time reviews
