Exclusive: Chinese-American lawyer reveals how con man was able to falsely accuse Jackson
Not long ago, lawyer Qiao from New York shared with us this fake documentary scandal and why these two liars were able to fool out such a big crisis. Here is her brief opinion for your reference:
I thought about it, how could these two liars have the IQ and financial resources to make this film and fool so many audiences.
I think the initiators and behind-the-scenes manipulators are really lawyers and directors.
They both use the same attorney, a sexual assault attorney in California, the same type of attorney we count.
The difference between this lawyer and other lawyers is that they are particularly aggressive.
This kind of lawyer has strong financial resources and never wins and does not charge. In California, the winning fee is 1/3 before the lawsuit and 40% after the lawsuit.
And for someone as big as MJ, it's the best commercial even if it doesn't win money, so they're so positive.
We in the industry understand this.
The lawyers who advertise in the United States are basically this kind of lawyers, and the lawyers who encounter this kind of high-exposure thing are all dicks.
For example, my ex-boss sued David Copperfield last year for losing a lot of money, but it was worth it to him. Every day the media reported on it like this, so it was a rare advertising opportunity for the law firm.
More importantly, this kind of lawyer also has a special feature of training people's credibility.
It's all the experience accumulated over the decades, and the understanding of the audience's (jury's) psychology is better than that of a psychiatrist.
This is very different from other lawyers. The important value of trial court lawyers lies in training the credibility of witnesses. Knowing how to speak to make people credible and in what order to make people credible is very deep.
Because cases like this always end up in front of a jury.
I heard people say that the content of the two is a lot similar, so I laughed.
Typical to create a pattern.
It's not that the two are colluding, they don't have such high IQ and skills, they are trained by lawyers.
If we have multiple victims in our case we will also ensure the consistency of witness statements.
Therefore, the reason why this film can fool so many people must be the lawyer who is behind the operation. You must know that these two have been trained by lawyers for several years.
In 2013 and 2014, in order to win the lawsuit, I must have been training back and forth for a long time, so when two people performed, maybe they believed it (this is the highest level of training, so that customers think that it really happened like that) of).
I had a long discussion with my husband, who is a trial attorney.
I said the same lawyer was used by both of them.
He said: "well then you don't have to say anything else"
(Ah that's right, then you don't need to say anything else)
There are also two people who said that they don't charge money for this film, which is also very stupid. Many viewers immediately said, wow, that must be true.
You have to know that after the film becomes popular, can the two of you not pay for various interviews? Then publish a book to make money, then make a movie, and then start a child molester charity (many charities in the United States are very profitable, for example, Trump’s favorite charity is the Trump Foundation, which is a good place to reduce taxes and avoid taxes to make money .
The attorney representing Wade Robertson and James Safechuck is Vince Finaldi, a well-known California sexual assault attorney.
View more about Leaving Neverland reviews
