in love with reason

Marquis 2022-04-23 07:03:47

Law always advocates reason, and art (literary and film art) appeals to human feelings. Reason is to limit evil, and human feelings are to encourage good... Is society more good or more evil? Or is it inherently evil or inherently good?
There is a story about love and reason in the notes of Yuewei Caotang. A child bride was always beaten, scolded and bullied by her aunt, and finally ran home unbearably. Her mother hid her so that her in-laws couldn't find her. The husband's family refused to give up, so they sued the government, and the government invited the old man next door to the child's house. Make this clear. The old man saw with his own eyes that Tong Yang daughter-in-law ran back to his house, but he also knew that Tong Yang daughter-in-law was tortured at her in-law's house. How should he choose? What if it was you?
As mentioned earlier, human feelings always encourage goodness. If rational laws conflict with human feelings, can we say that there is a conflict between law and goodness? In this case, should the law be adjusted appropriately? Just like the case of the child bride, does the child bride deserve to be beaten, scolded and bullied? If there is no corresponding system to protect them, more child brides will run back to their parents' homes to hide. . If our laws can be improved step by step in this way, then this society will not need to undergo too serious changes.
In fact, in American society, the improvement of the law has been done quite well, so we will find that it has not undergone major institutional changes for more than 200 years, and it seems that it is always making small repairs. If you carefully understand its history, you will find that the power of the President of the United States was very large at the beginning, and later through institutional improvements such as expanding the power of the justices (and therefore the so-called separation of powers was really realized, it turned out that only the president and the Congress had power), thus restricted the president. Then until Roosevelt's New Deal era, the president gave himself more real power by expanding the scope of government power, but it was not too obvious at the time. Later, through the efforts of Truman Reagan and other previous presidents, in the Bush era, the power of the president almost reached its peak...... It's far away, but I just want to say that even in a country like the United States, which is very sophisticated in self-evolution and perfection, in love and law There are so many struggles between them. Fortunately, they can always quickly find mistakes and improve after struggling - it's a process. We don't even have the process, let alone the result.
The old man didn't tell the truth in the end.
I also demand the freedom to decide my own life and death

View more about You Don't Know Jack reviews

Extended Reading

You Don't Know Jack quotes

  • Jack Kevorkian: It's emotionalism. You know, when heart transplants first started... there was the same prevalent feeling, I mean, even among doctors... that it was wrong, it was contrary to God's will, contrary to nature. Isn't it ghoulish to rip a person's chest open and take out a heart? Or a bypass operation? Ether is the same thing. You have ether, been around for centuries, it wasn't used. Not till 1846. It was discovered in 1543... and before that, everybody was being operated on while they were awake. Surgeons were cutting them open while they were awake. Did you know that, Geoff?

    Geoffery Fieger: No.

    Jack Kevorkian: On, yes. And you know why it was banned? Because of religious dogma. Because of the foolish notion... that there's a God Almighty who wills us to suffer.

  • Judge Cooper: You invited yourself here to make a final stand.

    Judge Cooper: You invited yourself to the wrong forum.

    Judge Cooper: Our nation tolerates differences of opinions, because we have a civilized and non-violent way of resolving our conflicts.

    Judge Cooper: We have the means and methods to protest laws with which we disagree.

    Judge Cooper: You can criticize the law, lecture about the law, speak to the media or petition voters.

    Judge Cooper: But you must always stay within the limits provided by the law. You may not break the law, or take the law into your own hands.

    Judge Cooper: No one's unmindful of the controversy and emotion that exists over end-of-life issues and pain control.

    Judge Cooper: I assume the debate will continue in a calm and reasoned forum long after this trial and your activities have faded from the public memory.

    Judge Cooper: But this trial was not about that controversy.

    Judge Cooper: This trial was about you, sir.

    Judge Cooper: You've ignored and challenged the legislature and the supreme court.

    Judge Cooper: Moreover, you've defied your own medical profession.

    Judge Cooper: This trial was about lawlessness, about your disregard for a society that exists and flourishes because of the strength of our legal system.

    Judge Cooper: No one is above the law.

    Judge Cooper: You had the audacity to go on national television, show the world what you did, and dare the legal system to stop you.

    Judge Cooper: You publicly and repeatedly announced your intentions to disregard the laws of Michigan.

    Judge Cooper: Because of this, I am imposing the maximum sentence of 10 to 25 years.

    Judge Cooper: You may now, sir, consider yourself stopped.