Support euthanasia

Carolyne 2022-04-22 07:01:47

When Al Pacino stooped and moved on the screen with his back hunched over, the "drama" who had passed away was really touching. So does Jack.

The greatness of the forerunners is not in the so-called "first to eat crabs", but in "before that, no one dared to eat them". Jack, is admirable. Regardless of whether "euthanasia" is legal or not, at least it has made outstanding contributions to the discussion of this issue. We felt the power of faith as this old stubborn sprinted around in pursuit of his patient's right to die!

He insisted on going to the Supreme Court, he insisted on fighting for the rights of patients, and he insisted on eating even if his mouth was full of blood from a crab.

He gambled on the possibility of enjoying his old age.

When the euthanasia opponents marched, they roared: "Life is God's choice!" Once again, they saw the harmful side of religion (religious belief has its positive meaning, not criticism) - giving the choice of life to both hands God. Inaction is nothing but this! For the sake of God, let yourself be tortured and let your loved ones struggle and cry--God exists, so beware!

Speaking of these religiousist demonstrations, let's go a little deeper.

Premarital sex is expressly opposed in the Christian doctrine of God. The truth, however, is that large groups of Christians are not shy about this seemingly difficult dogma! Premarital sex is widely known in Christian faith countries.

I'm just curious - how many of those marchers are? If it's not good, don't hold up God's flag to be sanctimonious.

So I hate the saying "Life is god's choice"!

Life is my choice. According

to the information in the film, euthanized patients voluntarily accept the end of their lives. For Jack, they are more grateful. The concept of "life is better than death" is still far away from the public, and the unfortunate people who have been devastated by illness are still a minority. Therefore, outsiders have never truly felt the yearning for death and liberation of those God's outcasts.

Therefore, the inviolability of life in the hearts of the public is inevitable. Because in their heads, there will never be the idea of ​​"to live is to suffer", and it is difficult to compare their hearts.

There are many scenes like this in film and television works: the victim is tied to a chair, and a big devil beside him said with a sinister smile: "Don't worry, I won't let you die. I will slowly torture you! "...very familiar, right? It is obvious to judge how precious the right of death is to him in a state where life is not as good as death and can no longer be born.

Jack fought for these people! Even if it is mixed with sporadic personal feelings, it is well-deserved greatness.

As for the various problems after the legalization of euthanasia, we should further consider and solve them. rather than escape.

In the era of carriages, the unlucky person who was never killed by a car.

View more about You Don't Know Jack reviews

Extended Reading

You Don't Know Jack quotes

  • Jack Kevorkian: It's emotionalism. You know, when heart transplants first started... there was the same prevalent feeling, I mean, even among doctors... that it was wrong, it was contrary to God's will, contrary to nature. Isn't it ghoulish to rip a person's chest open and take out a heart? Or a bypass operation? Ether is the same thing. You have ether, been around for centuries, it wasn't used. Not till 1846. It was discovered in 1543... and before that, everybody was being operated on while they were awake. Surgeons were cutting them open while they were awake. Did you know that, Geoff?

    Geoffery Fieger: No.

    Jack Kevorkian: On, yes. And you know why it was banned? Because of religious dogma. Because of the foolish notion... that there's a God Almighty who wills us to suffer.

  • Judge Cooper: You invited yourself here to make a final stand.

    Judge Cooper: You invited yourself to the wrong forum.

    Judge Cooper: Our nation tolerates differences of opinions, because we have a civilized and non-violent way of resolving our conflicts.

    Judge Cooper: We have the means and methods to protest laws with which we disagree.

    Judge Cooper: You can criticize the law, lecture about the law, speak to the media or petition voters.

    Judge Cooper: But you must always stay within the limits provided by the law. You may not break the law, or take the law into your own hands.

    Judge Cooper: No one's unmindful of the controversy and emotion that exists over end-of-life issues and pain control.

    Judge Cooper: I assume the debate will continue in a calm and reasoned forum long after this trial and your activities have faded from the public memory.

    Judge Cooper: But this trial was not about that controversy.

    Judge Cooper: This trial was about you, sir.

    Judge Cooper: You've ignored and challenged the legislature and the supreme court.

    Judge Cooper: Moreover, you've defied your own medical profession.

    Judge Cooper: This trial was about lawlessness, about your disregard for a society that exists and flourishes because of the strength of our legal system.

    Judge Cooper: No one is above the law.

    Judge Cooper: You had the audacity to go on national television, show the world what you did, and dare the legal system to stop you.

    Judge Cooper: You publicly and repeatedly announced your intentions to disregard the laws of Michigan.

    Judge Cooper: Because of this, I am imposing the maximum sentence of 10 to 25 years.

    Judge Cooper: You may now, sir, consider yourself stopped.